Question

У султана двугорбых верблюдов было в 7 раз больше, чем одногорбых.Сколько у султана было одногорбых верблюдов, если известно, что их на 156 меньше, чем двугорбых?

Answer 1

Пусть одногорбых верблюдов - х., тогда двугорбых будет 7х. Из всего условия можно составить уравнение:

7х-х=156

6х=156

х=26

х у нас было кол-во одногорбых верблюдов, значит:

Ответ: 26 одногорбых верблюдов.

Answer 2

Problem Analysis

We are given that the number of two-humped camels owned by a sultan is 7 times greater than the number of one-humped camels. We also know that the number of one-humped camels is 156 less than the number of two-humped camels. We need to determine the number of one-humped camels owned by the sultan.

Solution

Let's assume the number of one-humped camels owned by the sultan is x. According to the given information, the number of two-humped camels is 7 times greater than the number of one-humped camels. Therefore, the number of two-humped camels can be expressed as 7x.

We are also told that the number of one-humped camels is 156 less than the number of two-humped camels. Mathematically, this can be represented as:

7x - 156 = x

To solve this equation, we can subtract x from both sides:

7x - x = 156

Simplifying the equation, we have:

6x = 156

Dividing both sides by 6, we get:

x = 26

Therefore, the sultan owned 26 one-humped camels.

Answer

The sultan owned 26 one-humped camels.

Explanation

The number of one-humped camels owned by the sultan is 26, while the number of two-humped camels is 7 times greater, which is 182. The difference between the two numbers is indeed 156, as stated in the problem.

Example

Let's verify the solution with an example. If the sultan owned 26 one-humped camels and 182 two-humped camels, we can check if the given conditions are satisfied.

The number of two-humped camels is indeed 7 times greater than the number of one-humped camels: 182 = 7 * 26.

The number of one-humped camels is 156 less than the number of two-humped camels: 182 - 156 = 26.

Therefore, the solution is correct.