Вопрос задан 11.12.2023 в 01:04. Предмет Право. Спрашивает Ануфриев Миша.

Задача 225 При проведенні невідкладних ремонтних робіт у вихідний день бригада ремонтників зажадала

оплати проведеної роботи в подвійному розмірі. Адміністрація запропонувала бригаді відгули, з чим бригада не погодилася, і ремонтники звернулися до КТС. КТС вимоги робітників задовольнила. Чим мотивувала КТС, приймаючи таке рішення?​
0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Motivation of the KTS in satisfying the workers' demands

The KTS (КТС) likely motivated its decision to satisfy the workers' demands for double payment for the emergency repair work by considering various factors. While there may not be specific search results available for this particular scenario, we can make some reasonable assumptions based on general knowledge and common practices. Here are a few possible motivations for the KTS's decision:

1. Fairness and equity: The KTS may have considered the principle of fairness and equity in its decision-making process. If the workers performed emergency repair work on a weekend, they might argue that they deserve additional compensation for working during their time off. By granting the workers' request for double payment, the KTS could be seen as acknowledging the extra effort and inconvenience caused by the emergency repairs.

2. Maintaining a positive work environment: The KTS may have recognized the importance of maintaining a positive work environment and good relations with its employees. By satisfying the workers' demands, the KTS could demonstrate its willingness to listen to and address the concerns of its workforce. This could help foster a sense of trust and cooperation between the administration and the repair team.

3. Avoiding potential conflicts or disputes: The KTS may have considered the potential negative consequences of denying the workers' demands. If the administration had insisted on offering compensatory time off instead of double payment, it could have led to further disagreements and conflicts between the administration and the repair team. By choosing to satisfy the workers' demands, the KTS may have aimed to prevent any potential disputes or disruptions to the repair work.

It's important to note that the specific motivations of the KTS in this scenario may vary depending on the context, policies, and practices of the organization. Without more specific information, these are some general motivations that could explain the KTS's decision to satisfy the workers' demands for double payment.

0 0

Похожие вопросы

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Право

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Право

Задать вопрос