Question

Розв’яжіть юридичну ситуацію. За участь у несанкціонованому мітингу 17-річного Миколу та 16-річного Олега було притягнуто до відповідальності. До Миколи було застосовано адміністративний арешт строком на 15 діб, а до Олега - інший вид адміністративного стягнення штраф. • Дайте правовий аналіз ситуації. Визначте підстави та пра- вомірність притягнення до даного виду відповідальності. -​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Стаття 185-1 Кодексу України.

Порушення порядку організації і проведення зборів, мітингів, вуличних походів і демонстрацій.

Миколі 16 років, він вже може нести адміністративну відповідальність за скоєні вчинки, тому до нього було застосовано арешт.

А Олегу ще 15 років, тому він не може нести адміністративну відповідальність і має просто виплатили штраф.

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Legal Analysis of the Situation

In the given situation, two individuals, Mykola (17 years old) and Oleg (16 years old), were held accountable for their participation in an unauthorized protest. Mykola was subjected to administrative arrest for a period of 15 days, while Oleg received a fine as a form of administrative penalty.

The legal analysis of this situation involves determining the grounds and legality of holding these individuals accountable for their actions.

Grounds for Accountability: The grounds for holding Mykola and Oleg accountable for their participation in the unauthorized protest can be based on the following:

1. Violation of Public Order: Participating in an unauthorized protest can be considered a violation of public order, as it involves actions that disrupt the normal functioning of society and may lead to disturbances or potential harm to public safety.

2. Age of the Individuals: It is important to consider the age of the individuals involved. Mykola is 17 years old, while Oleg is 16 years old. The legal system in many jurisdictions treats minors differently from adults, taking into account their age and level of maturity. The specific laws and regulations governing the accountability of minors may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

Legality of Accountability: The legality of holding Mykola and Oleg accountable for their actions depends on the specific laws and regulations in the jurisdiction where the incident occurred. It is important to consult the relevant legal provisions to determine the legality of the actions taken against them.

1. Administrative Arrest: The decision to subject Mykola to administrative arrest for 15 days raises questions regarding the proportionality and legality of the punishment. It is necessary to examine the specific provisions of the law that allow for administrative arrest and the conditions under which it can be imposed. This will help determine whether the decision to impose administrative arrest on Mykola was justified and in accordance with the law.

2. Administrative Fine: The decision to impose an administrative fine on Oleg as a form of administrative penalty also requires examination. It is important to determine the legal basis for imposing fines in cases of unauthorized protests and whether the amount of the fine is proportionate to the offense committed.

Conclusion: In order to provide a more accurate legal analysis of the situation, it is necessary to consult the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the incident occurred. This will help determine the grounds and legality of holding Mykola and Oleg accountable for their participation in the unauthorized protest, as well as the appropriateness of the specific forms of punishment imposed on them.