Question

Мурат и Салтанат выехали за город на отдых. Во время благоприятного времяпровождения к ним подошли три молодых, подвыпивших людей. Используя ненормативную лексику молодые люди стали приставать к Марату и Салтанат. Испортив натроение отдыхающих, нагло съев приготовленный обед, молодые люди потребовали отвезти их в город. В это время Мурат, заметив, проезжающую неподалеку машину, закричал «Помогите», но водитель не услышал его. После этого молодые люди стали избивать Мурата. Мурат извернувшись от них, извлекает из багажника топор и наносит удар одному из молодых людей. Вопрос: Будет ли Мурат привлечен к уголовной ответственности? Какова степень ответственности участников события?

Answer 1

Ответ: Нет, Мурат не будет привлечен к ответственности, это была самооборона. Три выпивших молодых человека могут получить до 5 лет лишения свободы.

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Background Information

Murat and Saltanat went out of town for a vacation. During their leisure time, three young intoxicated individuals approached them and started harassing Murat and Saltanat. These young people used offensive language and spoiled the mood of the vacationers. They even boldly ate the prepared lunch and demanded to be taken back to the city. At that moment, Murat noticed a passing car and shouted for help, but the driver did not hear him. After this, the young people started beating Murat. In self-defense, Murat managed to grab an axe from the trunk and struck one of the young individuals.

Will Murat be held criminally responsible?

Whether Murat will be held criminally responsible depends on the circumstances surrounding the incident and the applicable laws in the jurisdiction where the incident occurred. In general, self-defense is a legal defense that allows individuals to protect themselves from harm when they reasonably believe they are in imminent danger.

To determine if Murat's actions fall under the legal definition of self-defense, several factors need to be considered, such as the level of threat posed by the attackers, the proportionality of Murat's response, and whether he had a reasonable belief that his life or physical well-being was in immediate danger.

It is important to note that laws regarding self-defense can vary between jurisdictions. Therefore, it would be necessary to consult the specific laws and legal precedents of the relevant jurisdiction to provide a definitive answer regarding Murat's potential criminal responsibility.

Degree of responsibility of the participants in the event

The degree of responsibility of the participants in the event can vary depending on their actions and intentions. Here is a breakdown of the potential degrees of responsibility:

1. The three young individuals: These individuals approached Murat and Saltanat, harassed them, consumed their food without permission, and demanded transportation back to the city. Their actions can be considered as harassment, theft, and potentially coercion. Their level of responsibility would depend on the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the incident occurred.

2. Murat: Murat initially shouted for help when he noticed a passing car, indicating that he was seeking assistance rather than engaging in a physical altercation. However, when the young individuals started physically assaulting him, Murat defended himself by striking one of them with an axe. The degree of responsibility for Murat's actions would depend on whether his response was proportionate to the threat he faced and whether he reasonably believed he was in immediate danger.

3. Saltanat: Based on the information provided, Saltanat's level of responsibility is not explicitly mentioned. However, if Saltanat actively participated in the altercation or took actions that contributed to the escalation of the situation, her degree of responsibility would need to be assessed accordingly.

It is important to note that the determination of the degree of responsibility for each participant would require a thorough examination of the specific facts and applicable laws in the jurisdiction where the incident occurred.