Question

Задача уголовное право. Поподробнее, плиз! ОРГОМНОЕ спасибо! Кулагин и Токманцев на одной из улиц напали на Кириллову, повалили ее на землю. Кулагин обыскал потерпевшую, а Токманцев сорвал с ее руки часы, после чего оба убежали. Определите форму и вид соучастия, виды соучастников.

Answer 1

Квалификация - грабеж (ст. 161 УК)
Соучастие - ч. 2 ст. 35 УК:2. Преступление признается совершенным группой лиц по предварительному сговору, если в нем участвовали лица, заранее договорившиеся о совместном совершении преступления. (если докажут, что был предварительный сговор)
Разделение ролей среди соучастников нет (преступники в равной части совершили преступление, невозможно выделить отдельно исполнителя либо организатора по ст. 33 УК). Такое соучастие называется простое - без выделения ролей

Answer 2

Understanding Criminal Law: Forms and Types of Accomplice Liability

In the scenario described, the actions of Kulyagin and Tokmantsev can be analyzed in the context of criminal law, specifically in terms of accomplice liability. Accomplice liability refers to the legal responsibility of individuals who assist or encourage the commission of a crime by another person. It is important to determine the form and type of accomplice liability, as well as the specific roles of the individuals involved.

Forms and Types of Accomplice Liability: Accomplice liability can take various forms, including aiding, abetting, counseling, and procuring. The specific type of accomplice liability depends on the nature of the assistance or encouragement provided by the individuals involved.

Roles of the Individuals: In the given scenario, Kulyagin and Tokmantsev are potentially involved in different roles that may correspond to distinct forms of accomplice liability. Kulyagin's act of searching the victim and Tokmantsev's act of taking the victim's watch may each represent different forms of accomplice liability.

Determining the Form and Type of Accomplice Liability

1. Form of Accomplice Liability: - Aiding and Abetting: If Kulyagin and Tokmantsev actively assisted or encouraged the commission of the crime, they may be considered as aiders and abettors.

2. Type of Accomplice Liability: - Aiding: Kulyagin's act of searching the victim could be categorized as aiding, as it directly facilitated the commission of the crime. - Abetting: Tokmantsev's act of taking the victim's watch could be categorized as abetting, as it may have encouraged or facilitated the commission of the crime.

Types of Accomplices

Principal in the First Degree: - This type of accomplice is directly involved in the commission of the crime and is present at the scene.

Principal in the Second Degree: - This type of accomplice is present at the scene of the crime but does not directly commit the criminal act.

Accessory Before the Fact: - This type of accomplice assists or encourages the commission of the crime but is not present at the scene.

Accessory After the Fact: - This type of accomplice assists the perpetrator after the crime has been committed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the actions of Kulyagin and Tokmantsev may be analyzed in terms of aiding, abetting, and the specific types of accomplice liability. The determination of their roles and the corresponding forms and types of accomplice liability will depend on the specific legal framework and evidence presented in the case.