Question

«Двоє підлітків 4. (19 років) і П. (17 років) вчинили серйозне адміністративне правопорушення, за що Кодексом України про адміністративні правопорушення у виняткових випадках застосовується такий вид покарання, як адміністративний арешт терміном до 15 діб, і таке рішення приймає лише суд». Ви суддя і розглядаєте цю справу. Яким буде Ваше рішення?

Answer 1

Ответ:

15 діб

Объяснение:

обом 15 діб нати. .

Answer 2

Decision in the Case of Two Teenagers Committing an Administrative Offense

As a judge, I would carefully consider the case of the two teenagers who committed a serious administrative offense. According to the Ukrainian Code of Administrative Offenses, in exceptional cases, administrative arrest for a period of up to 15 days can be imposed as a punishment for such offenses, and this decision can only be made by a court.

To make an informed decision, I would need to review all the relevant facts and evidence presented in the case. This would include examining the nature of the offense committed, any mitigating or aggravating circumstances, the previous conduct of the individuals involved, and any other relevant factors that may impact the decision.

It is important to ensure that the punishment imposed is fair and proportionate to the offense committed. The primary objective of the punishment should be to educate and rehabilitate the offenders, rather than solely focusing on retribution.

If, after careful consideration of the case, I find that the offense committed by the two teenagers warrants an administrative arrest, I would proceed with imposing the appropriate punishment. However, if I determine that there are mitigating circumstances or alternative measures that could be more effective in achieving the desired outcome, I would consider those options as well.

Ultimately, the decision would be based on a thorough analysis of the facts and legal provisions, with the aim of ensuring justice is served and the best interests of all parties involved are taken into account.

Please note that the specific details of the case were not provided, so the above response is a general outline of the decision-making process a judge would undertake in such a situation.