Question

У 2015 році Тамара, громадянка України, подала позов щодо розірвання шлюбу, в якому вона перебувала 14 років із громадянином іншої держави. Її чоловік щодо розірвання шлюбу заперечень не має, але суд із різних причин понад рік відкладав розгляд справи й винесення рішення. Тамара прагне спілкуватися зі своїми дітьми, народженими у шлюбі, але законодавство цієї країни забороняє їй це, поки не завершиться процедура розірвання шлюбу.1. Чи є в цій ситуації порушення прав людини?2. На яку статтю Європейської конвенції з прав людини (Конвенції про захист прав людини і основоположних свобод) може спиратися Тамара, щоб оскаржити ситуацію, що склалася?3. Опишіть різні етапи проходження скарги в Європейському суді з прав людини, яку може подати Тамара.​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Так, в цій ситуації порушення прав людини відбувається, оскільки Тамарі ускладнено зберігати контакт зі своїми дітьми через заборону на спілкування, що діє до розірвання шлюбу.

Тамара може спиратися на Статтю 8 Європейської конвенції з прав людини, яка гарантує право на приватне та сімейне життя.

Етапи проходження скарги в Європейському суді з прав людини включають подання скарги, розгляд національними органами, можливий медіаторський процес, розгляд справи судом, виконання рішення та подання апеляційної скарги (якщо необхідно).

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Situation Description

In 2015, Tamara, a citizen of Ukraine, filed a lawsuit to dissolve her marriage of 14 years with a citizen of another country. Her husband does not object to the dissolution of the marriage, but for various reasons, the court has postponed the hearing and decision for over a year. Tamara wants to communicate with her children, who were born during the marriage, but the legislation of the country prohibits her from doing so until the divorce procedure is completed.

Violation of Human Rights?

In this situation, there may be a violation of Tamara's human rights. The right to family life and the right to respect for private and family life are protected under various international human rights instruments, including the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Tamara's inability to communicate with her children due to the delay in the divorce proceedings could be seen as an interference with her right to family life and a violation of her rights.

Relevant Article of the European Convention on Human Rights

Tamara can rely on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to challenge the situation she is facing. Article 8 guarantees the right to respect for private and family life, and it includes the right to establish and maintain relationships with one's children. Tamara can argue that the prohibition on communicating with her children until the divorce is finalized is a violation of her rights under Article 8 of the ECHR.

Stages of Filing a Complaint with the European Court of Human Rights

If Tamara decides to pursue her case at the European Court of Human Rights, she would need to follow several stages:

1. Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies: Before applying to the European Court of Human Rights, Tamara must exhaust all available domestic remedies. This means she needs to pursue all possible legal avenues within the national legal system to address her complaint.

2. Application to the European Court of Human Rights: Once Tamara has exhausted domestic remedies, she can submit an application to the European Court of Human Rights. The application should include a detailed description of the facts, the alleged violation of rights, and the legal arguments supporting her case.

3. Admissibility Review: The Court will conduct an admissibility review to determine if the application meets certain criteria, such as being submitted within the prescribed time limit and not being manifestly ill-founded or an abuse of the right of application.

4. Communication to the Respondent Government: If the application is deemed admissible, it will be communicated to the government of the country concerned, giving them an opportunity to submit observations on the case.

5. Written and Oral Proceedings: The Court will examine the case based on the written submissions and may hold oral hearings if necessary. Tamara and the government will have the opportunity to present their arguments and evidence.

6. Judgment: The Court will issue a judgment, which may include a finding of a violation of rights and an order for the respondent government to take certain actions to remedy the situation.

It's important to note that the process of filing a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights can be complex and time-consuming. Tamara may want to seek legal advice or assistance to navigate the process effectively.

Please note that the information provided here is based on general knowledge and search results, and it is always advisable to consult legal professionals or relevant authorities for specific legal advice and guidance.