Вопрос задан 25.02.2019 в 09:42. Предмет Право. Спрашивает Дубровина Катя.

Почему бы Вы запретили 2 поправку в Сша (это закон о том, что каждый гражданин имеет право на

хранение и ношение оружия с собой). Помогите, очень срочно!!! 5-7 аргументов. Чем больше, тем лучше. Буду благодарна.
0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Субчак Святозар.
Оружие вообще надо запретить и без аргуметов
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Should the Second Amendment in the United States be banned?

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. However, there are arguments both for and against banning this amendment. Here are several arguments against the Second Amendment:

1. Public Safety: Banning the Second Amendment could potentially lead to a decrease in gun-related violence and improve public safety. The availability of firearms has been linked to higher rates of homicide and suicide.

2. Mass Shootings: The United States has experienced numerous mass shootings in recent years, and some argue that stricter gun control measures, including the banning of the Second Amendment, could help prevent such tragedies.

3. Gun-related Accidents: Banning the Second Amendment could reduce the number of accidental shootings, especially involving children. Studies have shown that access to firearms increases the risk of unintentional injuries and deaths.

4. Criminal Activity: Critics argue that the easy availability of firearms can contribute to criminal activity, including armed robberies and gang violence. Banning the Second Amendment could potentially make it more difficult for criminals to obtain firearms.

5. International Comparisons: Some proponents of banning the Second Amendment point to other countries with stricter gun control laws and lower rates of gun violence. They argue that the United States should follow these examples to reduce gun-related incidents.

6. Mental Health Concerns: Banning the Second Amendment could help address concerns regarding individuals with mental health issues obtaining firearms. Stricter regulations and background checks could potentially prevent those who pose a risk to themselves or others from accessing guns.

7. Constitutional Interpretation: There is ongoing debate about the interpretation of the Second Amendment. Some argue that it was intended to protect the right of individuals to bear arms for self-defense, while others believe it was meant to apply only to organized militias. Banning the Second Amendment would provide an opportunity to reevaluate and clarify its meaning.

It is important to note that these arguments against the Second Amendment are not universally accepted, and there are strong counterarguments in favor of preserving the right to bear arms. The issue of gun control is complex and multifaceted, and any decision regarding the Second Amendment would require careful consideration of various factors and perspectives.

0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Should the Second Amendment in the United States be banned?

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution grants citizens the right to keep and bear arms. However, the question of whether this amendment should be banned is a complex and contentious issue. Here are several arguments that have been made in favor of banning the Second Amendment:

1. Reducing Gun Violence: One argument for banning the Second Amendment is the belief that it would help reduce gun violence. Proponents argue that stricter gun control measures could prevent mass shootings, homicides, and suicides.

2. Public Safety: Banning the Second Amendment could be seen as a measure to enhance public safety. Supporters argue that by limiting access to firearms, it would reduce the risk of accidents, domestic violence incidents, and other gun-related incidents.

3. Preventing Terrorism: Some argue that banning the Second Amendment could help prevent acts of terrorism. They believe that stricter gun control measures would make it more difficult for terrorists to obtain firearms and carry out attacks.

4. Addressing Mental Health Concerns: Another argument is that banning the Second Amendment could help address mental health concerns. Proponents argue that stricter gun control measures would make it harder for individuals with mental health issues to access firearms, potentially reducing the risk of gun-related tragedies.

5. International Comparisons: Supporters of banning the Second Amendment often point to other countries with stricter gun control laws and lower rates of gun violence. They argue that adopting similar measures in the United States could lead to similar positive outcomes.

It is important to note that these arguments are not exhaustive and that there are also strong arguments against banning the Second Amendment. The issue of gun control is highly debated, and opinions on the matter vary widely. Ultimately, any decision regarding the Second Amendment would require careful consideration of constitutional rights, public safety, and the potential impact on society as a whole.

Please keep in mind that this response is based on general arguments and does not take into account specific legal, political, or cultural factors that may influence the debate.

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Право

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Право

Задать вопрос