Question

Задача. Пока работник был на перекуре, вода в электрическом чайнике, который он оставил включенным, выкипела. Чайник сгорел. Работник сказал, что у него дома имеется такой же чайник, и он принесет его взамен сгоревшего. Начальник потребовал, чтобы работник в наказание за то, что он слишком много курит, принес не «какой-то там старый», а 2 новых чайника. Прокомментируйте ситуации.

Answer 1

Электрический чайник самостоятельно должен был выключиться. Вины работника в его поломке нет. Просить чайники за частые перекуры - неправомерно

Answer 2

This is a question about the legal and ethical aspects of the situation between the worker and the boss. Here is my answer based on the web search results:

The worker was negligent and irresponsible by leaving the electric kettle on while he was on a break. He caused damage to the property of the company and wasted electricity. He should compensate the company for the loss of the kettle and apologize for his mistake.

The boss was unreasonable and unfair by demanding two new kettles instead of one old one. He had no legal basis to impose such a punishment on the worker. He also violated the worker's right to privacy by interfering with his personal habits. He should respect the worker's dignity and autonomy and accept his offer to replace the kettle with a similar one.

The situation could be resolved by following the principles of justice and goodwill. The worker and the boss should communicate honestly and respectfully and try to reach a mutually acceptable agreement. They should also consider the interests and feelings of each other and avoid further conflicts.