Question

Водитель Абрамов согласно медицинским рекомендациям был приведён без согласия сроком на 2 месяца на работу, не связанную с обслуживанием автотранспорта. Через месяц Абрамов обнаружил, что его зароботок на новом месте работы значительно меньше прежнего зароботка. В отделе кадров автотранспортной организации ему сообщили, что на основании действующего законодательства согласия работника на такой перевод не требуется, что касается оплаты труда, то другой работы, более высокооплачиваемой, для Абрамова нет. Выскажите правомерно ли действие в отношении Абрамова?

Answer 1

Нет, не правомерно..

Answer 2

Legal Action Regarding Abramov's Situation

According to the provided information, Abramov was transferred to a non-vehicle-related job without his consent for a period of 2 months. After a month, he discovered that his earnings at the new job were significantly lower than his previous earnings. When he inquired with the HR department of the transportation organization, he was informed that, based on current legislation, the employee's consent for such a transfer is not required. Additionally, they stated that there is no other higher-paying job available for Abramov.

The legality of the action taken against Abramov should be considered in light of the following points:

1. Medical Recommendations and Job Transfer: Abramov's transfer to a non-vehicle-related job without his consent for a period of 2 months, as per medical recommendations, should be evaluated for its compliance with labor laws and regulations.

2. Earnings Discrepancy: The significant decrease in Abramov's earnings at the new job compared to his previous role raises concerns about the fairness of the transfer and its impact on his livelihood.

3. Employee Consent and Higher-Paying Job Availability: The assertion by the HR department that employee consent is not required for such a transfer and that there are no other higher-paying job options for Abramov should be examined in the context of labor laws and employee rights.

Conclusion

The legality of the actions taken against Abramov appears to raise potential legal and ethical concerns. Further examination of labor laws, regulations, and employee rights is necessary to determine the lawfulness of the situation and to ensure Abramov's rights are upheld.