Question

Прочитайте стихотворение Р. Сефа «Странное дело». Подумайте, почему сапожника называли художником, а художника — сапожником. Какой смысл автор вложил в эти слова? Ответ должен быть развернутым, содержать не менее 5 предложений. Странное дело Странное дело, А может быть, нет — Жил-был На свете Когда-то Сапожник. Был он сапожником Сорок пять лет, Но про него Говорили: — Художник. Странное дело, А может быть, нет — Жил-был На свете Когда-то Художник. Был он Художником Семьдесят лет, Но про него Говорили: — Сапожник. Странное дело, А может быть, нет?

Answer 1

Ответ:

Возможно, что мой ответ будет неправильным.

Но я понимаю это как :

Люди - создания, которым не свойственно радоваться счастью и достижением друг друга, а особенно, если это чужие люди.

Так и в стихе Р. Сефа, каждый человек занят своим делом, промыслом, делает свою работу, старается. Сапожник чинит обувь, ремонтирует поломку , а ему в ответ - "да что ты?" делай по - другому. Ты же - художник, создаёшь будто новое !

Или художника назвали "Сапожником" , считая, что он ничем не занимается, ничего не делает - это не работа. " Сапожник"- своего рода оскорбление "неумело, неискуссно ".

Answer 2

The Poem "Stranno Delo" by R. Sef

The poem "Stranno Delo" by R. Sef tells a peculiar story about a shoemaker and an artist. The poem presents a paradoxical situation where the shoemaker is referred to as an artist, while the artist is called a shoemaker. The author, R. Sef, uses this paradox to convey a deeper meaning.

The Meaning Behind the Words

The poem raises the question of how society perceives and labels individuals based on their occupation or outward appearance. The author challenges the conventional understanding of what it means to be an artist or a shoemaker. By juxtaposing the two characters and their respective titles, R. Sef invites readers to reflect on the nature of artistry and the value society places on different professions.

The Shoemaker as an Artist

In the poem, the shoemaker is described as having practiced his craft for forty-five years, yet people referred to him as an artist. This suggests that the shoemaker's dedication, skill, and attention to detail in his work elevated his craftsmanship to the level of artistry. Despite not being traditionally recognized as an artist, the shoemaker's talent and passion allowed him to transcend the boundaries of his profession.

The Artist as a Shoemaker

Conversely, the artist in the poem is said to have been an artist for seventy years, but people called him a shoemaker. This implies that the artist's work may not have been widely recognized or appreciated by society. It raises questions about the value society places on art and the challenges artists may face in gaining recognition for their work. The artist's identity being reduced to that of a shoemaker highlights the discrepancy between his true artistic abilities and how he is perceived by others.

Challenging Labels and Stereotypes

Through the paradoxical situation presented in the poem, R. Sef challenges the labels and stereotypes imposed by society. The poem encourages readers to question the assumptions and judgments we make based on someone's occupation or outward appearance. It reminds us that true artistry can exist in unexpected places and that individuals should not be defined solely by their profession.

Conclusion

In "Stranno Delo," R. Sef uses the paradoxical situation of a shoemaker being called an artist and an artist being called a shoemaker to explore the nature of artistry and challenge societal perceptions. The poem invites readers to reflect on the value society places on different professions and the importance of recognizing true talent and passion, regardless of traditional labels.