Question

Помогите найти проблему автора в тексте Я не принадлежу к всеядным читателям, которые, словно осы на варенье, набрасываются на каждую публикацию в «толстом» литературном журнале, на каждое новое имя. У меня первое движение — отгородиться, защититься от неподготовленных, необязательных впечатлений, которые чаще всего лишь по-пустому отнимают время и душевные силы. А и того и другого осталось не так много. За прожитую жизнь скопилось немало книг, которые хочется вновь и вновь перечитывать. Мне кажется, что у определенной возрастной черты, если книги для тебя не просто заполнение досуга, не развлечение вроде телевизора, надо ставить дверь на запор и новых посетителей либо вовсе не впускать, либо — по самому строгому отбору. В одном Пушкине таятся такие глубины, что не хватит жизни добраться до дна. И все же трудно писателю решиться на это справедливое дело, ведь надо знать, что делается в литературе, и не из праздного любопытства и самолюбивого беспокойства, а ради профессиональной ориентировки: как и какими средствами отражается миг сегодняшнего бытия в искусстве, чьим материалом является слово, Где взять на все время? И поневоле задумаешься: не лучше ли еще раз перечитать «Смерть Ивана Ильича» Л. Н. Толстого, «Жизнь Арсень-ева» И. А. Бунина, «В сторону Свана» М. Пруста, чем тешить беса любопытства новым романом модного автора или рассказами таинственного незнакомца. (По очерку «Голландия Боба ден Ойла» )

Answer 1

Проблема в том, на то лучше потратить драгоценное время: на перечитывание и познание глубин творчества классиков, проверенного временем, или на знакомство с произведениями новых неизвестных авторов. 

Answer 2

Identifying the Author's Problem in the Text

The author expresses a reluctance to engage with new literary works and a preference for revisiting familiar books. They seem to be grappling with the dilemma of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works. The author also reflects on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may stem from a desire for deeper understanding and a sense of professional orientation in literature.

The author's dilemma seems to revolve around the conflict between the allure of revisiting familiar, profound literary works and the potential value of engaging with new, contemporary literature.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and substance in literature, rather than mere entertainment or passing curiosity.

The author's reflection on the depth of certain literary works and the professional orientation required to understand the reflection of contemporary life in art suggests a desire for a deeper understanding of literature and its role in reflecting the present.

The author's contemplation of whether to prioritize revisiting classic literature or exploring new works reflects a struggle with the balance between familiarity and novelty in literary consumption.

The author's reluctance to engage with new literary works and the contemplation of revisiting classic literature may indicate a preference for depth and