Вопрос задан 30.07.2018 в 08:26. Предмет Литература. Спрашивает Капустина Даша.

Привильно поступил Гамлет отомстив за отца?

0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Потась София.
Абсолютно. Важно понимать, что время действия находится на таком промежутке, в котором отказ от мести был бы порицаем.
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

I can understand and communicate fluently in Russian. Your question is about the tragedy of Hamlet by William Shakespeare. You want to know if Hamlet was right to avenge his father's death.

This is a complex and controversial question that has been debated by many critics and scholars. There is no definitive answer, but I can offer some possible perspectives.

One perspective is that Hamlet was justified in his revenge, because his uncle Claudius committed a heinous crime by killing his brother, usurping his throne, and marrying his widow. Hamlet had a duty to restore justice and honor to his family and his country. He also had a personal motive, as he loved his father and hated his uncle for his treachery and incest. Hamlet's revenge was not only right, but necessary.

Another perspective is that Hamlet was wrong to pursue his revenge, because it led to more violence and suffering for himself and others. Hamlet's revenge was based on the dubious testimony of a ghost, which could have been a deception or a delusion. Hamlet also hesitated and procrastinated, which showed his doubts and moral conflicts. He killed innocent people, such as Polonius, Rosencrantz, and Guildenstern, and indirectly caused the deaths of Ophelia and Laertes. He also endangered the stability and security of Denmark, which was threatened by the invasion of Fortinbras. Hamlet's revenge was not only wrong, but futile.

A third perspective is that Hamlet's revenge was neither right nor wrong, but inevitable. Hamlet was a tragic hero, who was doomed by his fate and his character. He was caught in a web of circumstances that he could not escape or control. He was driven by his emotions, his conscience, his ideals, and his flaws. He was a victim of his own actions and the actions of others. He was a human being, who faced the dilemmas and contradictions of life. Hamlet's revenge was not a matter of choice, but of necessity.

These are some of the possible ways to approach your question. You may agree or disagree with any of them, or form your own opinion. You can find more information and analysis on the tragedy of Hamlet by following these links:

- [Гамлет — Википедия](https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82) - [«Гамлет» анализ произведения Шекспира – тема, жанр, план, вывод трагедии](https://obrazovaka.ru/sochinenie/gamlet/analiz-proizvedeniya-shekspira.html) - [Гамлет (фильм, 1964) — Википедия](https://bing.com/search?q=)

I hope this helps you. Thank you for using Bing.

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Литература

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Литература

Задать вопрос