Вопрос задан 22.11.2023 в 13:19. Предмет Қазақ тiлi. Спрашивает Гребенников Максим.

8-тапсырма. Оқылым мәтініндегі ауызекі сөйлеу тілінің ерекшеліктері бар сейлемдерді аныктап,

көшіріп жаз.
0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Матяш Диана.

Ответ:

где текст по этому заданию ?????


0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Differences in Oral and Written Language

Oral and written language have distinct characteristics and differences. While both forms of communication serve the purpose of conveying information, they differ in terms of structure, delivery, and interaction. Here are some key differences between oral and written language:

1. Structure: Oral language tends to be less structured compared to written language. In oral communication, sentences may be shorter, less grammatically complex, and more conversational in nature. On the other hand, written language often follows more formal grammar rules and allows for longer and more complex sentences.

2. Delivery: Oral language is delivered in real-time through speech, allowing for immediate feedback and interaction between the speaker and the listener. This enables the speaker to adjust their message based on the listener's response. In contrast, written language is static and lacks the immediate feedback and interaction found in oral communication.

3. Interaction: Oral language allows for non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, gestures, and tone of voice, which can enhance the meaning and understanding of the message. Written language, however, relies solely on the words on the page or screen, without the benefit of non-verbal cues.

4. Permanence: Written language has a greater degree of permanence compared to oral language. Once written, the message can be preserved and referred to at a later time. Oral language, on the other hand, is transient and can be easily forgotten or misinterpreted if not recorded.

5. Audience: Oral language is often tailored to a specific audience and context. The speaker can adapt their language, tone, and style based on the listener's background, knowledge, and relationship. In written language, the audience is often more diverse and less immediate, requiring the writer to consider a broader range of readers.

6. Spontaneity: Oral language is often more spontaneous and allows for immediate expression of thoughts and ideas. It can be more flexible and dynamic, with the ability to adapt to the flow of conversation. Written language, on the other hand, allows for more careful planning and revision before the message is conveyed.

7. Accessibility: Oral language is more accessible to individuals who may have limited literacy skills or visual impairments. It allows for direct communication without the need for reading or writing. Written language, however, requires literacy skills and visual interpretation.

Overall, oral and written language have their own strengths and weaknesses. Both forms of communication are essential and complement each other in various contexts. The choice between oral and written language depends on the purpose, audience, and medium of communication.

[[1]]

0 0

Похожие вопросы

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Қазақ тiлi

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Қазақ тiлi

Задать вопрос