Question

Почему Александр 1 не решился на коренные изменения(конституция,крепостное право)в жизни страны!?

Answer 1

Александр I был слишком зависим от дворянства,если еще отменить и крепостное право,то дворянство могло полностью обеднеть.Тоже самое и с конституцией.Опять же,влияние дворян,так как права дворян и помещиков(да и всю олигархию) могли быть ограничены буквой закона.

Answer 2

Alexander I and the Lack of Radical Changes in Russia

Alexander I, who ruled Russia from 1801 to 1825, did not implement radical changes such as constitutional reforms or the abolition of serfdom during his reign. There were several reasons for this:

1. Political Climate and External Threats: One of the main reasons Alexander I did not pursue radical changes was the political climate and the external threats facing Russia at the time. During his reign, Russia was engaged in a series of wars, including the Napoleonic Wars, which required a strong and stable government. Alexander believed that implementing radical changes could potentially destabilize the country and weaken its ability to defend itself against external threats.

2. Conservatism and Traditionalism: Alexander I was known for his conservative and traditionalist views. He believed in maintaining the existing social order and was hesitant to introduce sweeping reforms that could disrupt the established hierarchy. This conservative mindset, combined with his belief in the divine right of kings, made him resistant to radical changes.

3. Influence of Advisors and Nobility: Alexander I was influenced by his advisors and the nobility, who were generally opposed to radical reforms. The nobility, in particular, benefited from the existing system of serfdom and had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. They exerted significant influence over the decision-making process and were able to prevent or delay any attempts at radical change.

4. Lack of Consensus and Opposition: Another factor that contributed to Alexander I's reluctance to implement radical changes was the lack of consensus among the ruling elite and the opposition he faced. There were different factions within the government, each with their own interests and agendas. This made it difficult to reach a consensus on major reforms, and any attempts to introduce radical changes would have faced significant opposition.

In conclusion, Alexander I did not implement radical changes such as constitutional reforms or the abolition of serfdom during his reign due to the political climate, his conservative views, the influence of advisors and the nobility, and the lack of consensus and opposition he faced. These factors combined to create a situation where radical reforms were deemed too risky or impractical at the time.