Question

Сравни армии Валленштейна и Густава-Адольфа ,оцени их действия с точки зрения немецкого крестьянина XVI века и его потомка XXI. Помогите пожалуйста !!!

Answer 1

Армия Валенштейна.Распутная, недисциплинированная, жаждет наживы. Грабят всех подряд, и, следовательно, никем хорошо оценимы не будут. Армия же Густава-Адольфа дисциплинированнее, сдержаннее, никого не грабят, и воспринимаются крестьянами с большей симпатией.

Answer 2

Comparison of Wallenstein and Gustavus Adolphus

When comparing the armies of Wallenstein and Gustavus Adolphus, it is important to consider the perspective of a German peasant in the 16th century and their descendant in the 21st century. Let's examine the actions of both commanders and evaluate their impact.

Wallenstein was a prominent military leader during the Thirty Years' War in the 17th century. He was known for his ability to raise and command large armies, as well as his strategic brilliance. Wallenstein's forces were often composed of mercenaries, which allowed him to assemble a formidable army. His military campaigns were marked by ruthless tactics and a focus on achieving victory at any cost.

Gustavus Adolphus, on the other hand, was the King of Sweden during the same period. He is widely regarded as one of the most successful military commanders of his time. Gustavus Adolphus introduced innovative tactics and reforms to his army, such as the use of combined arms and the development of a highly disciplined infantry. His forces were known for their mobility and effectiveness in battle.

From the perspective of a German peasant in the 16th century, both Wallenstein and Gustavus Adolphus would have been seen as powerful figures who exerted control over their territories. However, the impact of their actions would have been experienced differently.

For a German peasant in the 16th century, the presence of Wallenstein's army could have been both a source of fear and an opportunity for economic gain. The armies of the time often relied on requisitioning supplies from the local population, which could have placed a burden on the peasants. On the other hand, the presence of a large army could have created opportunities for trade and employment, as soldiers required various goods and services.

Gustavus Adolphus, with his emphasis on discipline and professionalism, may have been seen as a more benevolent leader by the German peasants