Question

Политика военного коммунизма вынужденная?

Answer 1

Политика военного коммунизма - это красный террор и продовольственная диктатура. Продовольственная диктатура - по сути это грабеж. Итак, вы террор и грабёж называете вынужденной мерой? Террор и грабёж - это преступления, советская власть проводила преступную политику по отношению к собственному населению. Вы преступления называете вынужденной мерой?

Answer 2

As of my last update in September 2021, "military communism" refers to a specific policy implemented by the Bolshevik government in Russia during the Russian Civil War (1918-1922). This policy was characterized by the centralization of economic and political power, with the state taking control of all means of production and distribution, as well as the introduction of strict requisitioning and rationing measures to support the Red Army and the war effort.

Whether military communism was considered "necessary" or "forced" is a matter of historical interpretation and can be debated among historians and political experts. Some argue that the policy was a response to the extraordinary circumstances of the Civil War, where the Bolsheviks faced severe internal and external threats to their new revolutionary government. The Russian economy was in shambles, and the Bolsheviks needed to mobilize resources quickly to defend the fledgling Soviet state and to feed and equip the Red Army.

On the other hand, critics of military communism contend that the policy resulted in economic inefficiencies, widespread suffering among the civilian population, and a harsh suppression of political opposition. They argue that the Bolshevik leadership could have pursued alternative approaches to address the challenges they faced.

It's important to note that different historical contexts and political ideologies can lead to varying assessments of the necessity or reasons behind implementing a particular policy like military communism. It's also crucial to consider that my knowledge is up to September 2021, and there may have been further developments or changes in historical interpretations since then.