Question

Мог ли кредитор убить своего должника (во время ссоры) в Древнем Риме?

Answer 1

Ответ:

основным источником рабов был захват в плен именно пленные иностранцы составляли подавляющее большинство рабов в древнем Риме о чём свидетельствует анализ многочисленных письменных источников в частности надгробных надписей

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Could a creditor kill their debtor (during an argument) in Ancient Rome?

In Ancient Rome, the relationship between creditors and debtors was governed by specific laws and customs. While there were severe consequences for defaulting on debts, it was not legally permissible for a creditor to kill their debtor during an argument. The Roman legal system provided mechanisms for resolving disputes and enforcing debt repayment, but it did not condone or allow violence as a means of debt collection.

Roman Legal System and Debt Collection The Roman legal system had well-established procedures for debt collection. Creditors could seek legal remedies to recover their debts, such as filing a lawsuit or obtaining a judgment against the debtor. The debtor's property could be seized or sold to satisfy the debt, but violence against the debtor was not an acceptable method of debt collection.

Protection of Debtors In Ancient Rome, debtors had certain legal protections. The Twelve Tables, a set of laws that formed the foundation of Roman law, included provisions to prevent excessive punishment or abuse by creditors. Debtors had the right to be protected from physical harm and were not subject to arbitrary violence from their creditors.

Punishment for Violence If a creditor resorted to violence against a debtor, they could face legal consequences themselves. The Roman legal system had penalties for assault and murder, and individuals who engaged in such acts could be held accountable under the law.

Conclusion In summary, it was not permissible for a creditor to kill their debtor during an argument in Ancient Rome. The Roman legal system provided mechanisms for debt collection and protection for debtors, and violence was not an acceptable means of debt recovery.