Question

Помогите с этим пожалуйста 1 What basis did you decide your ranking on: usefulness to humans? beauty? size? species that live in your country? 2 Why are most people more interested in saving larger and more beautiful animals than smaller and less beautiful ones?​

Answer 1

Відповідь:

Пояснення:

1)The basis of my ranking is usefulness to humans as well as the impact on the environment. I consider species that provide important ecosystem services, such as pollination, nutrient cycling, and soil conservation, to be highly valuable. I also take into account species that are threatened or endangered, as they require conservation efforts to ensure their survival.

2)Most people are more interested in saving larger and more beautiful animals because they are more charismatic and attract more attention. In addition, people often perceive larger animals as more important because they have a greater impact on their environment. However, it is important to remember that all species, regardless of their size or beauty, play important roles in maintaining the balance of ecosystems and should be considered for conservation efforts.

Answer 2

1. The basis for ranking animals can vary depending on the context and the specific goals or criteria being considered. Here are a few common factors that can influence the ranking of animals:

• Usefulness to humans: Some rankings may consider the practical benefits that animals provide to humans, such as their role in agriculture, research, or other industries.

• Conservation status: Endangered or threatened species may receive higher rankings due to the urgency of protecting them and preventing their extinction.

• Ecological significance: Animals that play critical roles in maintaining ecosystem balance or have a profound impact on their habitats might be prioritized.

• Cultural or symbolic importance: Certain animals may hold significant cultural or symbolic value to a particular country or region, leading to their higher ranking.

• Biodiversity: Rankings may take into account the diversity of species within a country or region, aiming to protect a wide range of animals and maintain overall ecosystem health.

It's important to note that different organizations, countries, or individuals may prioritize different factors when ranking animals, and there is no universally agreed-upon ranking system.

2. The preference for saving larger and more beautiful animals over smaller and less attractive ones can be attributed to several factors:

• Aesthetic appeal: Many people are naturally drawn to visually striking animals or those considered conventionally beautiful. These animals often receive more attention and media coverage, which can increase public awareness and support for their conservation.

• Charismatic species: Certain animals, typically larger or more iconic ones, tend to capture public imagination and generate more empathy. These charismatic species, like elephants or tigers, often serve as "flagship species" for conservation efforts, attracting attention and resources that can benefit other less charismatic species indirectly.

• Emotional connection: Larger and more recognizable animals may elicit stronger emotional responses from people, leading to increased interest in their well-being and conservation. People may feel more connected to animals they can relate to or perceive as intelligent and capable of experiencing emotions.

• Ecological impact: Larger animals often play significant ecological roles and can have a cascading effect on their ecosystems. Saving them can have a broader impact on preserving habitats and maintaining biodiversity.

However, it is crucial to recognize the value of all species, regardless of their size or attractiveness. Biodiversity is vital for ecosystem stability, and every species, regardless of its appearance, contributes to the intricate web of life on Earth. Conservation efforts should strive to protect the full spectrum of biodiversity, from the smallest to the largest and from the least attractive to the most visually appealing animals.