Question

Верховная власть в государстве Н передается по наследству. Какая дополнительная информация позволит сделать вывод о том ,что государство Н является конституционной монархиейварианты ответа 1)монарх назначает главу кабинета менистров 2)полномочия монарха ограничены законом3)послы иностранных государств вручают свои верительные грамоты монарху 4)монарх является верховным главнокомандующимбольшое спасибо!

Answer 1

Ответ:
................2

Answer 2

The Nature of State N's Supreme Power

The question asks about the transfer of supreme power in State N and what additional information would allow us to conclude that State N is a constitutional monarchy. To answer this question, we need to consider the characteristics of a constitutional monarchy and determine if State N exhibits those characteristics.

Constitutional Monarchy

A constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch serves as the head of state within the parameters of a constitution. The monarch's powers are limited by law, and the government is usually run by elected officials. The monarch's role is largely ceremonial, with limited or no involvement in day-to-day governance.

Analyzing the Given Information

Let's analyze the given information to determine if it supports the conclusion that State N is a constitutional monarchy:

1) The monarch appoints the head of the cabinet of ministers: This information suggests that the monarch has some influence in the executive branch of government. However, it does not necessarily indicate that State N is a constitutional monarchy. In some countries, even those with a constitutional monarchy, the monarch may have the power to appoint the head of the cabinet. Therefore, this information alone is not sufficient to conclude that State N is a constitutional monarchy.

2) The monarch's powers are limited by law: This information aligns with the characteristics of a constitutional monarchy. In a constitutional monarchy, the powers of the monarch are constrained by a constitution or other legal documents. This suggests that State N may indeed be a constitutional monarchy.

3) Foreign ambassadors present their credentials to the monarch: This information indicates that the monarch has a ceremonial role in receiving foreign diplomats. While this is a common practice in constitutional monarchies, it is not exclusive to them. Therefore, this information alone does not definitively establish State N as a constitutional monarchy.

4) The monarch is the supreme commander-in-chief: This information suggests that the monarch holds significant power over the military. However, it does not necessarily indicate that State N is a constitutional monarchy. In some countries, the monarch may have a role in the military without being a constitutional monarch. Therefore, this information alone is not sufficient to conclude that State N is a constitutional monarchy.

Conclusion

Based on the given information, it is possible to make a preliminary conclusion that State N is a constitutional monarchy. The fact that the monarch's powers are limited by law aligns with the characteristics of a constitutional monarchy. However, it is important to note that additional information about the political system, the role of the monarch, and the presence of a constitution would be necessary to make a definitive conclusion.

Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with!