Question

Алик Давыдов,10 лет, нашел в песочнице забытую кем- то заводную машину и взял ее себе, считая себя ее собственником. На следующий день Галя Галкина заявила, что это ее машина. Родители Гали предъявили ключ от машины и потребовали игрушку вернуть. Родители Алика отказались, заявив, что, раз машина была забыта, их сын стал собственником. Возникло ли у Алика право собственности? Свой ответ аргументируйте

Answer 1

Нет,не возникло.
Так можно и считать:
Увидел машины(двери не закрыты),сел в нее ,и по просьбе водителя выйти из его машины отказываюсь. Говоря,что теперь я собственник этой машины.
Так жи не бывает.

Answer 2

Ownership of the Found Toy Car

According to the scenario provided, 10-year-old Alik Davydov found a forgotten wind-up toy car in the sandbox and took it, considering himself the owner. The next day, Galia Galkina claimed that the toy car belonged to her. Galia's parents presented the key to the car and demanded that the toy be returned. However, Alik's parents refused, stating that since the car was abandoned, their son became the owner. The question is whether Alik has the right to ownership of the toy car.

Ownership of Abandoned Property

In general, the ownership of abandoned property is determined by the legal principle of "finders keepers." This principle states that if someone finds abandoned property and takes possession of it, they become the owner. However, the specific laws regarding abandoned property may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

Legal Considerations

To determine whether Alik has the right to ownership of the toy car, several legal considerations need to be addressed:

1. Abandonment: It is important to establish whether the toy car was truly abandoned. Abandonment typically requires the owner to intentionally relinquish their ownership rights with no intention of reclaiming the item. If the toy car was genuinely abandoned, Alik may have a stronger claim to ownership.

2. Age of the Parties: The age of the individuals involved, particularly Alik and Galia, may impact the legal analysis. Laws regarding the ownership of abandoned property by minors can vary, and there may be additional considerations to protect the interests of children.

3. Evidence of Ownership: Galia's parents claim that the toy car belongs to Galia and have presented the key as evidence. This evidence suggests that Galia or her parents may have a stronger claim to ownership. However, it is important to note that the mere possession of a key does not necessarily establish ownership.

Conclusion

Based on the information provided, it is difficult to definitively determine whether Alik has the right to ownership of the toy car. The resolution of this situation would likely depend on the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in which it occurred, as well as any additional evidence or circumstances not mentioned in the scenario.

It is recommended that the parties involved seek legal advice or mediation to resolve the dispute and determine the rightful owner of the toy car.