Question

ДАЮ 35 БАЛЛОВ!!! Главный специалист НИИ Кубацкая по роду выполняемой работы использовала компьютер. В нерабочее время она разрешила воспользоваться им своему шестнадцатилетнему сыну Андрею. Когда Кубацкая на некоторое время отлучилась, мальчик по ошибке ввел команду на уничтожение важной информации. Используя необходимые программы, Кубацкая не сумела восстановить утраченное. На следующий день она была вынуждена доложить руководству учреждения о случившемся. Дайте анализ содеянного всеми упомянутыми лицами, рассмотрите все элементы состава правонарушения и квалифицирующие признаки.

Answer 1

Это халатность .

Если информация важна ,например военная или экономики предприятия ,то может дойти до возбуждения уголовного дела,а если просто,например документ о зарплате сотрудников и их адресов ,то в зависимости от решения руководства последует наказание выговоров ,штраф или иное.

Наказание понесет Кубацкая.

Answer 2

Analysis of the Situation

In this scenario, the main specialist at the Kubatskaya Research Institute allowed her 16-year-old son, Andrey, to use the computer during non-working hours. While Kubatskaya was temporarily away, Andrey mistakenly entered a command that resulted in the destruction of important information. Kubatskaya attempted to recover the lost data but was unsuccessful. The following day, she reported the incident to the institution's management. Let's analyze the actions of all the individuals involved and consider the elements of the offense and qualifying features.

Analysis of the Actions

1. Kubatskaya: - Allowed her son to use the computer during non-working hours. - Failed to properly secure the computer or supervise her son's activities. - Was unable to recover the lost data using necessary programs. - Reported the incident to the institution's management.

2. Andrey: - Used the computer without proper authorization. - Mistakenly entered a command that resulted in the destruction of important information.

Elements of the Offense

Based on the provided information, several elements of the offense can be identified:

1. Unauthorized Use of Computer: Andrey used the computer without proper authorization from Kubatskaya or any other authorized person.

2. Destruction of Important Information: Andrey's mistaken command resulted in the destruction of important information.

3. Failure to Properly Secure the Computer: Kubatskaya failed to properly secure the computer, allowing unauthorized access and potential misuse.

Qualifying Features

The qualifying features of this offense may vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific laws applicable. However, some potential qualifying features could include:

1. Negligence: Kubatskaya's failure to properly secure the computer and supervise her son's activities could be considered negligent behavior.

2. Damage to Important Information: The destruction of important information could be considered a qualifying feature, as it may have significant consequences for the institution.

3. Unauthorized Access: Andrey's use of the computer without proper authorization could be considered unauthorized access, which may be a qualifying feature.

It is important to note that the specific legal consequences and charges resulting from this situation would depend on the applicable laws and regulations in the relevant jurisdiction. It is advisable to consult with legal professionals or authorities to obtain accurate and jurisdiction-specific information.