Question

Упражнение 17. Как развивался конфликт между Бимом и тёткой? Оправдана ли такая месть? Что препятствова- ло принятию грамотных решений и эффективному взаи- модействию между субъектами конфликта? Используя разделительные союзы или, либо, то… то, не то… не то, или… или, либо… либо, переделайте и запишите предложения, в которых хозя- ин Бима надеется на то, что пёс жив. Сторож был неумолим: - Замечательных не сажают, - потому он и сказал строго: - Видишь? «Вход запрещен». Иван Иваныч уже потерял надежду проникнуть во двор, но всё же сказал: - Эх, ты! Человек, человек!… Операция1 была. От войны осколок носил вот тут. Приехал, а Бим пропал. - Как так? Более двадцати годов носил осколок? Вот тут? - Сторож неожиданно стал самим собой. Он прими- рительно пригласил, открывая засов: - Заходи. Да только никому не говори. Иван Иваныч отпустил3 такси, в надежде на то, что по- ведёт Бима на поводке, и пошёл к фургону. Шёл он действи- тельно с огромной надеждой: если Бим здесь, то он сейчас его увидит, приласкает, если же Бима нет, то, значит, он тоже жив, найдётся. И вот сторож распахнул дверь фургона. Иван Иваныч отшатнулся и окаменел… Бим лежал носом к двери. Губы и дёсны изодраны о рва- ные края жести. Ногти передних лап налились кровью… Он царапался до последнего дыхания. И как мало он про- сил. Свободы и доверия - больше ничего. Лохматка, забившись в угол, завыла. Иван Иваныч положил руку на голову Бима - верного, преданного, любящего друга. (Г. Н. Троепольский)

Answer 1

Объяснение:

Эта женщина не любила бима

потому и отдала волкодавам (людям которые не любят собак и их ловят)

А бим пытался найти выход чтобы дальше искать хозяина

А хозяин вернулся и вот что

он думал что он жил но оказалось что нет

Answer 2

Conflict between Bim and Aunt

The conflict between Bim and his aunt in the story is primarily centered around the mistreatment and eventual disappearance of Bim, the dog. Bim's owner, Ivan Ivanovich, had entrusted the care of Bim to his aunt while he was away at war. However, the aunt did not treat Bim well and neglected him. When Ivan Ivanovich returned from the war and discovered that Bim was missing, he confronted the aunt, who initially denied any knowledge of Bim's whereabouts. Eventually, it is revealed that the aunt had sold Bim to a dog catcher, leading to his suffering and eventual death.

Justification for Revenge

The question of whether the revenge taken by Ivan Ivanovich was justified is subjective and open to interpretation. On one hand, Bim was a loyal and beloved companion to Ivan Ivanovich, and the mistreatment and loss of Bim caused him great pain and grief. This could be seen as a valid reason for seeking revenge against the aunt who was responsible for Bim's suffering. On the other hand, revenge is generally considered to be a negative and destructive response to conflict, and it may not bring true resolution or healing. It is important to consider alternative ways of addressing conflicts that promote understanding, communication, and reconciliation.

Obstacles to Effective Decision-Making and Interaction

Several factors hindered the ability of the individuals involved in the conflict to make rational decisions and effectively interact with each other. These obstacles include:

1. Emotional attachment: Both Ivan Ivanovich and the aunt were emotionally attached to Bim, which clouded their judgment and influenced their actions. Emotions can often lead to impulsive and irrational decision-making.

2. Lack of communication: The aunt initially denied any knowledge of Bim's whereabouts, which prevented open and honest communication between her and Ivan Ivanovich. This lack of communication hindered the resolution of the conflict and led to further misunderstandings.

3. Lack of trust: The aunt's mistreatment of Bim and her initial denial of responsibility eroded the trust between her and Ivan Ivanovich. Without trust, it becomes difficult to find common ground and work towards a resolution.

4. Inability to see the bigger picture: The conflict between Bim and the aunt was fueled by personal grievances and emotions, which prevented the individuals from considering the broader consequences of their actions. This narrow focus on personal interests hindered the ability to find a mutually beneficial solution.

Using Separative Conjunctions to Rewrite Sentences

To rewrite the sentences using separative conjunctions, we can use words like "either...or," "neither...nor," "or," "either," "or," "whether...or," or "or...or." Here are the rewritten sentences:

1. The owner of Bim either hopes that the dog is alive or not. The caretaker was adamant and said sternly, "You see? 'No Entry.'" 2. Ivan Ivanovich had already lost hope of entering the yard but still said, "Oh, you! A human, a human!... Operation 1 was carried out. He carried a fragment of the war here. He arrived, and Bim was gone." 3. The caretaker unexpectedly became himself and invited Ivan Ivanovich in, opening the latch, and said, "Come in. Just don't tell anyone." 4. Ivan Ivanovich called for a taxi, hoping that Bim would be on a leash and went to the van. He went with great hope: if Bim was here, he would see him, caress him. If Bim was not here, it meant he was still alive and would be found. 5. The guard opened the van door. Ivan Ivanovich recoiled and froze... Bim lay with his nose against the door. His lips and gums were torn, with jagged edges of scars. The nails of his front paws were filled with blood... He fought until his last breath. And how little he achieved. Freedom and trust - nothing more. The shaggy dog, cowering in the corner, howled. Ivan Ivanovich put his hand on Bim's head - a faithful, loyal, loving friend. (G.N. Troepolsky)