Question

Кожанов стоял возле общежития. К нему подошел пьяный Курилов и беспричинно затеял ссору: бранился, оскорблял, пытался ударить. В ответ Кожанов дважды ударил Курилова в лицо, тот упал и ударился головой о камень, получив тяжелую черепно-мозговую травму. Подлежит ли Кожанов уголовной ответственности? Как оценить действия Кожанова в случае, если бы он для разрешения возникшего конфликта подобранным на месте происшествия кирпичом нанес Курилову удар по голове, что вызвало причинение его здоровью тяжкого вреда?

Answer 1

Да, уголочку несет. Тяжкие телесные, вполне возможно, тяжкие телесные по неосторожности. Если бы ещё удар кирпичом, это уже просто тяжкие телесные, значит, ещё больше впаяют.

Answer 2

I am not a lawyer, but I can try to provide some general information on the subject. Please note that laws may vary depending on your jurisdiction, and it's important to consult a legal professional for specific advice.

In the first scenario you described, where Kozhanov was provoked and acted in self-defense by hitting Kurilov in response to an unprovoked attack, Kozhanov might be able to argue a case for self-defense. Self-defense is a legal concept that allows individuals to protect themselves from harm when faced with an imminent threat. The key factors in determining the legality of self-defense would include the level of force used by Kozhanov, the proportionality of the response, and whether he had a reasonable belief that he was in danger.

However, even in cases of self-defense, the exact circumstances, local laws, and other factors will determine whether Kozhanov will face any legal consequences. It's crucial to consult a legal expert to get a precise assessment based on the specific jurisdiction involved.

In the second scenario, where Kozhanov used a brick found at the scene to strike Kurilov, the situation might change significantly. If Kozhanov used excessive force and the response was not proportionate to the threat he faced, it could weaken his claim of self-defense. In some jurisdictions, the use of a weapon like a brick could be considered an escalation of force beyond what is reasonable for self-defense.

In both cases, the actions of Kozhanov will be assessed based on the principles of self-defense, and the specific circumstances will determine whether he may be held criminally liable or not. If there were any witnesses, surveillance footage, or other evidence, it could play a crucial role in the legal proceedings.

Again, it's essential to consult a qualified attorney to obtain precise legal advice tailored to the specific jurisdiction and circumstances surrounding the incident.