Question

Отношение М.Ю.Лермонтова к крепостным крестьянам?

Answer 1

Нормально он к ним относился) 
был достаточной щедрым 
С первых же лет в творчестве Лермонтова звучит протест против барского произвола. Лермонтов всегда был  против угнетения человека. Это можно проследить  в стихотворении «Жалобы турка». В своих произведениях Лермонтов выступает как враг и противник крепостного права. В своих творениях крепостной крестьянин берется им под защиту , например,  в драмах «Странный человек» и «Люди и страсти». Крепостному крестьянству сочувствует Лермонтов, помещики и угнетатели вызывают у него гневное возмущение.

Answer 2

Mikhail Lermontov's Attitude Toward Serfs

Mikhail Lermontov, a prominent Russian writer and poet, had a complex and evolving attitude toward serfs during his lifetime.

Early Works: Lermontov's early works, such as his novel "A Hero of Our Time" published in 1839, depicted the harsh reality of serfdom in Russia. These works often portrayed the suffering and oppression experienced by the serfs. Lermontov's portrayal of serfs in his early works reflected a critical and empathetic stance toward their plight.

Later Works: As Lermontov's career progressed, his attitude toward serfs seemed to evolve. In his later works, such as the poem "The Demon" published in 1843, there are indications that Lermontov's perspective on serfdom became more nuanced. Some interpretations suggest that he may have become more ambivalent or even less sympathetic toward the serfs.

Overall Perspective: Lermontov's overall perspective on serfs appears to have been influenced by the social and political context of his time. The evolving nature of his attitude toward serfs may reflect the changing dynamics of Russian society during the 19th century, including the gradual reforms and shifting power dynamics between the nobility and the serfs.

In conclusion, Mikhail Lermontov's attitude toward serfs can be characterized as initially critical and empathetic, but with potential shifts in perspective in his later works, reflecting the complexities of the social and political landscape of his era.