Question

Кто, по вашему, виноват в том что Митрофан неуч, невежа и грубиян?из комедии недоросль

Answer 1

ЕГО МАМА, она его воспитывала чтобы он умел командовать, но науку она и он не любят

Answer 2

Analysis of "Nedrosovl" Comedy

In the comedy "Nedrosovl," the character Mitrofan is often portrayed as an uneducated, ignorant, and boorish individual. The question of who is to blame for these traits can be analyzed within the context of the play and the societal influences of the time.

Societal Influences

Societal Norms and Expectations: The portrayal of Mitrofan as a "неуч" (uneducated), "невежа" (ignorant), and "грубиян" (boor) may reflect the societal norms and expectations of the time period in which the comedy is set. During the 18th and 19th centuries, education and manners were highly valued, and individuals who did not conform to these standards were often ridiculed or marginalized.

Cultural and Social Pressures: The cultural and social pressures of the time may have contributed to the characterization of Mitrofan. The comedy likely aimed to satirize and critique the societal attitudes towards education, knowledge, and behavior, using Mitrofan as a caricature of those who did not meet the expected standards.

Theatrical Context

The Role of Satire: In comedic works such as "Nedrosovl," characters like Mitrofan are often used as satirical devices to highlight and critique societal issues. The portrayal of Mitrofan as uneducated, ignorant, and boorish may serve as a commentary on the flaws and hypocrisies of the society in which the play is set.

Character Development and Contrast: Mitrofan's traits may also be a deliberate choice by the playwright to create contrast with other characters in the play. By juxtaposing Mitrofan's characteristics with those of other characters, the playwright may have aimed to emphasize certain themes or messages within the comedy.

In conclusion, the portrayal of Mitrofan as uneducated, ignorant, and boorish in the comedy "Nedrosovl" can be attributed to a combination of societal influences, cultural pressures, and the theatrical context of the play. The character likely serves as a satirical device to critique societal norms and expectations, as well as to create contrast with other characters for dramatic effect.