Вопрос задан 10.05.2019 в 00:46. Предмет История. Спрашивает Книшик Тетяна.

СРОЧНО5 отличий всеобщей декларации прав человека и декларации трудящихся

0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Осинов Никита.
Равственность есть выражение морали, ее норм. Как раз идеи равноправия и всеобщего братства есть одни из самых главных, я считаю, в морали. Поэтому Всеобщая Декларация прав человека и базируется на началах нравственности (и не только она, в правовом государстве все нормативно-правовые акты должны базироваться на них)
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Differences between the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Declaration of the Rights of Workers

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the Declaration of the Rights of Workers (DRW) are two important documents that address different aspects of human rights. While both declarations aim to protect and promote the rights of individuals, they have distinct focuses and purposes. Here are five key differences between the two:

1. Scope and Focus: - The UDHR is a comprehensive document that outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms that should be universally protected for all individuals, regardless of their status or occupation. - The DRW, on the other hand, specifically focuses on the rights of workers and seeks to ensure fair treatment, just working conditions, and the right to organize and bargain collectively.

2. International Recognition: - The UDHR is a universally recognized document that was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. It has been widely accepted as a standard for human rights and has influenced the development of international human rights law. - The DRW, while important in its own right, does not have the same level of international recognition and acceptance as the UDHR.

3. Legal Status: - The UDHR is not a legally binding document, meaning that it does not impose legal obligations on states. However, it has served as the basis for the development of legally binding human rights treaties and conventions. - The DRW, depending on the country, may have different legal statuses. Some countries may have incorporated the principles of the DRW into their national laws, while others may not have specific legislation addressing the rights of workers.

4. Content and Emphasis: - The UDHR covers a wide range of civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights. It includes rights such as the right to life, liberty, and security of person, the right to work, the right to education, and the right to freedom of expression. - The DRW primarily focuses on the rights of workers, including the right to fair wages, safe working conditions, social security, and the right to form and join trade unions.

5. Historical Context: - The UDHR was drafted in the aftermath of World War II, with the aim of preventing future atrocities and promoting peace and justice. It was a response to the recognition of the inherent dignity and equal rights of all individuals. - The DRW emerged during the rise of labor movements and the fight for workers' rights in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It reflects the specific challenges and demands faced by workers during that time.

It is important to note that these differences do not diminish the significance of either declaration. Both the UDHR and the DRW contribute to the protection and promotion of human rights, albeit with different emphases and scopes.

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории История

Последние заданные вопросы в категории История

Задать вопрос