Вопрос задан 28.02.2019 в 12:11. Предмет История. Спрашивает Аникина Софья.

Почему Ивана Грозного считают жестоким?? Что он сделал?? И почему убил своего сына??

0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Timin Adrian.
Иван грозный считался тираном из-за своей политики и мероприятий,которые проводил с жителями гос-ва (любил частенько ездить на санях и давить людей)
по легенде он убил своего сына из-за того,что тот заступился за свою жену,а государю это не понравилось,ударил Ивана,тот и умер 
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Ivan the Terrible: A Controversial Figure

Ivan the Terrible, also known as Ivan IV, is a historical figure who ruled as the first Tsar of Russia from 1547 to 1584. He is often described as a complex and controversial leader, with opinions about his reign varying greatly. While some view him as a strong and visionary ruler who expanded Russia's territory and centralized power, others consider him to be a cruel and tyrannical figure due to his harsh policies and violent actions.

Ivan's Reputation for Cruelty

Ivan the Terrible is often considered cruel due to several actions and policies during his reign. Here are some key points that contribute to this perception:

1. The Oprichnina: In 1565, Ivan established the Oprichnina, a separate territory within Russia that was under his direct control. This period was marked by widespread terror, purges, and executions, as Ivan sought to eliminate his perceived enemies and consolidate his power. The Oprichnina is often seen as a symbol of Ivan's brutality and the suffering it caused.

2. Massacre of Novgorod: In 1570, Ivan ordered the massacre of the city of Novgorod, which resulted in the deaths of thousands of people. This brutal act was seen as a punishment for suspected disloyalty and rebellion against his rule.

3. Treatment of the Boyars: Ivan's relationship with the nobility, known as the boyars, was often strained. He frequently executed or exiled boyars, leading to a climate of fear and instability among the ruling class.

4. Personal Violence: Ivan was known for his violent outbursts and physical abuse towards those around him, including his own son. In a fit of rage, he struck his son Ivan Ivanovich, which ultimately led to the young prince's death. The exact circumstances and motivations behind this act remain a subject of debate among historians.

Historical Interpretations and Context

It is important to note that historical interpretations of Ivan the Terrible's reign can vary, and different sources may present different perspectives. Some argue that Ivan's actions were driven by a desire to centralize power and protect Russia from external threats, while others emphasize the brutality and suffering caused by his policies.

It is also crucial to consider the historical context in which Ivan ruled. Russia during this period faced numerous challenges, including internal strife, external threats, and political instability. These factors may have influenced Ivan's actions and contributed to the perception of him as a harsh and ruthless leader.

Conclusion

In summary, Ivan the Terrible is considered a cruel figure due to his establishment of the Oprichnina, the massacre of Novgorod, his treatment of the boyars, and his personal acts of violence. However, it is important to approach historical figures with a nuanced understanding, considering different perspectives and the historical context in which they operated.

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории История

Последние заданные вопросы в категории История

Задать вопрос