Вопрос задан 15.02.2019 в 09:32. Предмет История. Спрашивает Шаханова Аяулым.

Кто знает????? Чому реформа 1861 року більше була на користь поміщикам, ніж селянам???

0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Котовский Плюша.
Отмена крепостного права
0 0
Отвечает Тугов Даниил.
Тому що поміщики виділяли селянам погані землі(неродючі)хороші землі лишали собі, ціна на ту землю була втричі вища за ринкова
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Reform of 1861 in Russia

The reform of 1861 in Russia was intended to address the issue of serfdom, which was a system where peasants were bound to the land and under the control of the landowners, known as pomeshchiks. The reform aimed to emancipate the serfs and provide them with certain rights and freedoms. However, the reform was more beneficial to the pomeshchiks than to the peasants for several reasons.

Economic Compensation for Landowners: The reform provided economic compensation to the landowners for the loss of their serfs. This compensation was in the form of government-issued bonds, which were meant to represent the value of the serfs who were being emancipated. However, the actual value of these bonds was often less than the perceived value of the serfs to the landowners, leading to dissatisfaction among the peasants.

Land Redistribution: The reform did not provide the peasants with the best agricultural land. Instead, the land that was allocated to the peasants was often of inferior quality, while the best lands remained in the hands of the pomeshchiks. This unequal distribution of land limited the economic prospects of the peasants and perpetuated their dependence on the landowners.

Debt Burden: Many peasants were burdened with debt to the landowners, and the reform did not alleviate this burden. The compensation provided to the landowners often came from the future labor of the peasants, as they were required to work off the debt through labor obligations. This perpetuated the economic control of the landowners over the peasants.

Limited Political Rights: The reform did not grant the peasants significant political rights or autonomy. They remained subject to the authority of the landowners and the state, with limited ability to advocate for their own interests or participate in the political process.

In summary, the reform of 1861 in Russia was more beneficial to the pomeshchiks than to the peasants due to the economic compensation provided to landowners, unequal land redistribution, perpetuation of debt burden, and limited political rights granted to the peasants.

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории История

Последние заданные вопросы в категории История

Задать вопрос