Question

Чем модель Вселенной по Копернику отличалась от модели Вселенной по Птолемею?

Answer 1

Вселенная Н. Коперник и его модель Вселенной. 1400 лет господствовало учение Птолемея о Вселенной. Оно поддерживалось церковью и казалось неопровержимым. (может так? чесн незнаю)

Answer 2

Difference Between the Copernican Model and the Ptolemaic Model of the Universe

The Copernican model of the universe, proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus, differed significantly from the Ptolemaic model, which was widely accepted before the Copernican revolution.

1. Geocentric vs. Heliocentric: - The Ptolemaic model was geocentric, meaning it placed the Earth at the center of the universe, with the other celestial bodies orbiting around it. - In contrast, the Copernican model was heliocentric, placing the Sun at the center of the universe, with the Earth and other planets orbiting around it.

2. Retrograde Motion: - The Ptolemaic model required complex epicycles and deferents to explain the observed retrograde motion of planets. - Copernicus' heliocentric model simplified the explanation of retrograde motion by attributing it to the relative speeds and distances of the planets from the Sun.

3. Philosophical and Scientific Impact: - The Copernican model challenged the prevailing Aristotelian view of the universe and laid the groundwork for the scientific revolution. - It also had profound philosophical implications, as it shifted humanity's perception of its place in the cosmos.

4. Historical Context: - Copernicus' model was published in his work "De revolutionibus orbium coelestium" in 1543, while the Ptolemaic model had been the dominant cosmological model for over a millennium.

In summary, the Copernican model of the universe differed from the Ptolemaic model by proposing a heliocentric system, simplifying the explanation of planetary motion, and challenging the prevailing scientific and philosophical views of the time.