Question

1.Феодальная раздробленность в Древней Руси: А) последствия татаро-монгольского ига Б) следствие господства натурального хозяйства В) результат княжеской политики 2.Что послужило причиной нашествия Татаро-монгольского ига: А) слабость русских княжеских боевых дружин Б) состояние договоров между князьями о взаимопомощи В) феодальная раздробленность русских княжеств 3.Основной особенностью сословно-представительной монархии в России XVI в. является А) сословный характер власти Б) ограничение самодержавной власти представительными органами В) укрепление самодержавной власти 4.Каким государством предпочтительнее назвать Россию в XVII в. А) абсолютной монархией Б) ограниченной монархией В) сословно-представительной монархией 5.Что являлось социальной базой абсолютной монархии в России при ПетреI? А) бояре и крепостные Б) дворянское сословие В) крепостническое дворянство и служилое сословие

Answer 1

Ответ:

1. Б 2А 3А 4 В 5А ВОТ ОТВЕТЫ НА ВОПРОСЫ

Answer 2

Ответ:

1в

2в

3в

4а

5в

Объяснение:

Answer 3

Feudal Fragmentation in Ancient Rus:

A) The consequences of the Tatar-Mongol yoke were significant in contributing to the feudal fragmentation in Ancient Rus. The Tatar-Mongol yoke led to the subjugation of the Russian principalities under the Golden Horde, resulting in a decentralized political structure and weakened central authority.

B) The dominance of a natural economy also played a role in the feudal fragmentation. The prevalence of a natural economy, where goods and services were exchanged directly for other goods and services, contributed to the economic and political fragmentation of the Russian principalities.

C) The result of princely policies also contributed to the feudal fragmentation in Ancient Rus. The internal conflicts and power struggles among the princes further weakened the unity of the region, leading to increased feudal fragmentation.

Causes of the Tatar-Mongol Yoke Invasion:

The invasion of the Tatar-Mongol yoke was primarily caused by:

A) The weakness of the Russian princely military retinues. The lack of a unified and strong military force among the Russian princes made them vulnerable to external invasions, facilitating the Tatar-Mongol conquest.

B) The state of agreements between the princes regarding mutual assistance. The lack of a unified front and mutual support among the Russian princes made it easier for the Tatar-Mongol forces to conquer and subjugate the Russian principalities.

C) The feudal fragmentation of the Russian principalities also served as a significant factor in the Tatar-Mongol invasion. The disunity and lack of a centralized authority made it easier for the Tatar-Mongol forces to conquer and establish control over the region.

Characteristics of the Estate-Representative Monarchy in 16th Century Russia:

The main characteristic of the estate-representative monarchy in 16th century Russia is:

A) The estate-based nature of power. The estate-representative monarchy in 16th century Russia was characterized by the division of society into distinct estates or classes, each with its own rights and privileges, which influenced the exercise of power.

Preferred Classification of Russia in the 17th Century:

It is preferable to classify Russia in the 17th century as:

A) An absolute monarchy. The 17th century Russia was characterized by the consolidation of absolute power in the hands of the monarch, with limited checks on their authority, making it fitting to classify it as an absolute monarchy.

Social Basis of Absolute Monarchy in Russia during Peter the Great's Reign:

The social basis of absolute monarchy in Russia during Peter the Great's reign was primarily:

A) The nobility and serfs. The absolute monarchy in Russia during Peter the Great's reign was supported by the nobility and the serfs, who formed the social basis of the autocratic rule