Question

Задание 3. Ответьте на вопросы. 1.Как вы думаете, какой источник более близок к истине – сведения Историка Полина ИИБехистунская надпись Дария 1? Приведите доказательства подтверждающие ваше мнение2.Смог Ли Дарий I полностью подчинить саков, приведите доказательство.​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Бехистунская надпись — трёхъязычный (древнеперсидский, эламский и аккадский) клинописный текст на скале Бехистун (Бисутун), юго-западнее Экбатан между Керманшахом и Хамаданом в Иране, высеченный по приказу царя Дария I о событиях 523—521 гг. до н. э. Самая важная по значению из надписей ахеменидских царей и один из крупнейших эпиграфических памятников древности. Прочтён (в основном) в 30—40-х гг. XIX века английским учёным Генри Роулинсоном, что положило начало дешифровке клинописного письма многих народов древнего Востока.

Объяснение:

правда не знаю правильно или нет, сразу прошу прощения если не правильно(

Answer 2

Question 1: Как вы думаете, какой источник более близок к истине – сведения Историка Полина ИИБехистунская надпись Дария 1? Приведите доказательства подтверждающие ваше мнение.

To determine which source is more likely to be closer to the truth - the information from Historian Polina II Behistun Inscription Darius 1 - we need to consider the credibility and reliability of each source.

The Behistun Inscription is an ancient multilingual inscription located on Mount Behistun in Iran. It was created by Darius the Great, the king of the Achaemenid Empire, around 520 BCE. The inscription provides valuable historical information about Darius' rise to power and his conquests.

Polina II is not a recognized historian or source of information that can be easily verified. Without further information about Polina II and her credentials, it is difficult to assess the reliability and accuracy of her claims.

Given that the Behistun Inscription is an ancient primary source created by Darius himself, it is generally considered to be a more reliable and credible source of information compared to an unknown historian like Polina II. The inscription provides firsthand accounts of historical events and is widely studied and referenced by scholars.

Therefore, based on the available information, it is more reasonable to consider the Behistun Inscription as a source that is closer to the truth compared to the information provided by Polina II.

Question 2: Смог ли Дарий I полностью подчинить саков, приведите доказательство.

Darius I, also known as Darius the Great, was the king of the Achaemenid Empire from 522 BCE to 486 BCE. He is known for his military campaigns and efforts to expand the empire.

Regarding the subjugation of the Scythians (Sakas), there is evidence to suggest that Darius I did not fully conquer them. The Scythians were a nomadic people who inhabited the region north of the Black Sea.

According to historical accounts, Darius I launched a military campaign against the Scythians around 513 BCE. While Darius achieved some victories and established control over certain Scythian territories, he did not completely subdue the Scythians or bring them under his direct rule.

The Greek historian Herodotus, who lived during the 5th century BCE, provides information about Darius' campaign against the Scythians. Herodotus mentions that Darius faced difficulties in his campaign and eventually decided to retreat without achieving a decisive victory over the Scythians.

Based on Herodotus' account and other historical sources, it can be concluded that Darius I was not able to fully subjugate the Scythians. The Scythians remained a formidable force in the region and maintained their independence.

In conclusion, there is evidence to suggest that Darius I did not succeed in completely subjugating the Scythians, as mentioned by Herodotus and other historical sources.