Question

3.3. У римському праві існувала норма «Quis? Quid? Ubi? Quibus auxiliis? Cur? Quomodo? Quando?», що в перекладі означає «Хто? Що? Де? Із чиєю допомогою? Чому? Як? Коли?» — запитання, що їх ставить собі особа, котра взялася за розслiдування злочину. Так само дослідник минулого послуговується цими запитаннями. Спробуй себе в ролі історика. Прочитай довідку, підкресли ключові слова та реконструюй історичний факт. CРОЧНО!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

я прикрепила 2-е фото, возможно тебе про цивилизацию надо тоже.

Answer 2

Roman Law and the Norm "Quis? Quid? Ubi? Quibus auxiliis? Cur? Quomodo? Quando?"

In Roman law, there existed a norm known as "Quis? Quid? Ubi? Quibus auxiliis? Cur? Quomodo? Quando?" which translates to "Who? What? Where? With what assistance? Why? How? When?" These questions were used by individuals conducting investigations, such as those investigating crimes or studying the past. By asking these questions, investigators aimed to gather comprehensive information and understand the various aspects of the subject under investigation.

As an historian, it is important to utilize these questions to reconstruct historical facts and gain a deeper understanding of the events and circumstances surrounding them. By asking "Who?" and "What?", you can identify the key individuals and actions involved. "Where?" helps determine the geographical context, while "With what assistance?" explores the support or resources utilized. "Why?" delves into the motivations and reasons behind the events, "How?" examines the methods and processes employed, and "When?" establishes the chronological sequence of events.

By applying these questions to historical research, you can gather relevant information, analyze different perspectives, and reconstruct a more comprehensive understanding of the past. It allows you to delve deeper into the motivations, actions, and consequences of historical events.

Remember, historical research involves analyzing various sources, including primary and secondary sources, to gather evidence and form a well-rounded interpretation of the past.