Question

СРОЧНО!!!!!!!!!!!! Поясніть , у чому полягає суперечливість подій:австрыйський цар скасовуэ панщину , а селяни пыднымаються на повстання

Answer 1

Ответ:

Пжл переведи на руский

Объяснение:

Пжпжпжпжпжпжп

Answer 2

Background Information

In order to understand the contradiction between the actions of the Austrian emperor and the peasant uprising, it is important to have some background information.

During the 19th century, the Austrian Empire was characterized by a feudal system, where the majority of the population, including peasants, were subject to serfdom or "panchyna" in Ukrainian. Serfdom was a form of bondage where peasants were tied to the land and had to provide labor and other services to the landowners, who were typically nobles or the church. This system created significant social and economic inequalities.

Abolition of Serfdom by the Austrian Emperor

In 1848, a series of revolutions and uprisings swept across Europe, including the Austrian Empire. These revolutions were driven by demands for political and social reforms, including the abolition of serfdom. In response to these demands, Emperor Ferdinand I of Austria issued the "Patent of Emancipation" on October 7, 1848, which abolished serfdom and granted personal freedom to the peasants.

The abolition of serfdom by the Austrian emperor was a significant step towards granting more rights and freedoms to the peasants. It aimed to address the social and economic inequalities that existed under the feudal system.

Peasant Uprising

However, despite the abolition of serfdom, the peasants still faced numerous challenges and grievances. The emancipation did not immediately improve their living conditions or address other issues such as land ownership and economic opportunities. As a result, many peasants became disillusioned and frustrated with the slow pace of change.

These frustrations eventually led to peasant uprisings in various parts of the Austrian Empire, including Ukraine. The peasants demanded not only the abolition of serfdom but also the redistribution of land, fairer taxation, and better working conditions. They believed that the emancipation had not gone far enough in addressing their grievances.

The contradiction between the actions of the Austrian emperor and the peasant uprising lies in the fact that while the emperor abolished serfdom, the peasants were still dissatisfied with the overall socio-economic conditions and demanded further reforms.

Conclusion

In summary, the contradiction between the actions of the Austrian emperor and the peasant uprising can be attributed to the fact that while the emperor abolished serfdom, the peasants still faced numerous challenges and grievances. The abolition of serfdom was an important step towards granting more rights and freedoms to the peasants, but it did not fully address their demands for land redistribution, fairer taxation, and better working conditions. This dissatisfaction eventually led to peasant uprisings in various parts of the Austrian Empire.