Question

Причины слабости казахов в борьбе с правителями Коканда и Хив Причины выбора части казахов Старшего жуза российского подданства Предположите последствия вхождения Казахстана в состав Коканда и Хив Роль лидеров восстаний в борьбе против Хив и Коканда ПОМОГИТЕ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Потому что в среднем Азии их было намного больше

Они не любили Россию

Последняя очень не хорошая иза Росии

Answer 2

Weaknesses of the Kazakhs in their struggle against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva

The Kazakhs faced several challenges and weaknesses in their struggle against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva. Some of the key reasons for their weaknesses include:

1. Geographical factors: The vast territory of the Kazakh steppe made it difficult for the Kazakhs to unite and coordinate their resistance against external powers. The nomadic lifestyle of the Kazakhs also made it challenging to mount a sustained resistance against the more centralized and organized Kokand and Khiva states.

2. Lack of centralized authority: The Kazakhs were organized into different tribal groups, each with their own leaders and interests. This lack of a centralized authority made it difficult to form a united front against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva.

3. Limited military capabilities: The Kazakhs relied primarily on their nomadic lifestyle and horsemanship skills for defense. However, they lacked the military organization and resources to effectively counter the more powerful and centralized armies of Kokand and Khiva.

4. Internal divisions: The Kazakhs were not always united in their resistance against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva. Internal divisions, rivalries, and conflicts among different Kazakh tribes weakened their collective strength and hindered their ability to mount a successful resistance.

5. Limited access to external support: The Kazakhs had limited access to external support, such as weapons, supplies, and alliances, which further weakened their position in the struggle against Kokand and Khiva.

[[1]] [[2]] [[3]]

Reasons for some Kazakhs choosing Russian citizenship in the Senior Horde

During the period of Russian expansion into Central Asia, some Kazakhs from the Senior Horde (Zhetysu) chose to become Russian subjects. There were several reasons for this choice:

1. Protection against external threats: The Kazakhs in the Senior Horde faced constant threats from neighboring powers, including Kokand and Khiva. By becoming Russian subjects, they hoped to gain the protection of the Russian Empire against these external threats.

2. Access to trade and economic opportunities: The Russian Empire offered trade and economic opportunities that were not available under the rule of Kokand and Khiva. Becoming Russian subjects allowed the Kazakhs to engage in trade with the expanding Russian market and benefit from the economic development brought by Russian presence in the region.

3. Desire for stability and security: The Kazakhs in the Senior Horde may have chosen Russian citizenship in search of stability and security. The Russian Empire provided a more centralized and organized system of governance compared to the fragmented and often turbulent rule of Kokand and Khiva.

4. Influence of Russian cultural and educational institutions: The Russian Empire established cultural and educational institutions in the region, which may have attracted some Kazakhs to Russian citizenship. These institutions offered opportunities for education, cultural exchange, and exposure to Russian language and culture.

[[4]] [[5]]

Potential consequences of Kazakhstan joining Kokand and Khiva

If Kazakhstan had joined Kokand and Khiva, there could have been several potential consequences:

1. Loss of autonomy: Joining Kokand and Khiva would have likely resulted in the loss of autonomy for Kazakhstan. The Kazakhs would have become subjects of these states and would have had to adhere to their laws and governance systems.

2. Increased influence of Kokand and Khiva: Kazakhstan's integration into Kokand and Khiva would have strengthened the influence and control of these states over the region. The rulers of Kokand and Khiva would have had greater authority over the Kazakhs and their territories.

3. Changes in cultural and social dynamics: Joining Kokand and Khiva could have led to changes in the cultural and social dynamics of Kazakhstan. The Kazakhs may have been influenced by the cultural practices and norms of Kokand and Khiva, potentially leading to shifts in their traditional way of life.

4. Potential conflicts and tensions: The integration of Kazakhstan into Kokand and Khiva could have resulted in conflicts and tensions between the Kazakhs and the rulers of these states. Differences in governance, culture, and interests could have led to resistance and unrest among the Kazakhs.

[[6]] [[7]]

Role of leaders in uprisings against Kokand and Khiva

The leaders of uprisings played a crucial role in the Kazakhs' struggle against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva. These leaders emerged as key figures in organizing and leading resistance movements. Some of their roles and contributions include:

1. Mobilizing and uniting the Kazakhs: The leaders of uprisings played a vital role in mobilizing and uniting the Kazakhs against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva. They rallied the Kazakhs, encouraged resistance, and fostered a sense of unity and purpose among the Kazakh tribes.

2. Providing military leadership: The leaders of uprisings often assumed military leadership roles, organizing and leading armed resistance against the forces of Kokand and Khiva. They strategized, coordinated attacks, and defended Kazakh territories against external aggression.

3. Negotiating alliances and support: The leaders of uprisings sought alliances and support from external powers, such as the Russian Empire, to bolster their resistance efforts. They negotiated alliances, sought military assistance, and coordinated their actions with external forces.

4. Inspiring and motivating the Kazakhs: The leaders of uprisings served as inspirational figures, motivating the Kazakhs to resist and fight against the rulers of Kokand and Khiva. Their leadership and charisma played a crucial role in sustaining the morale and determination of the Kazakhs in their struggle.

[[8]] [[9]]