Question

Почему не убивают "Великих" людей при смене власти, переворотах, путчах и т.п., заменяя казнь на ссылку?

Answer 1

Смотря о ком идет речь. Например, малолетнего Ивана VI, императора из брауншвейгской династии Елизавета Петровна пожалела лишь из-за возраста, и, вероятно того, что позже пообещает за время своего правления не пролить не капли крови. Характер ее властвования как-раз таки и будет направлен на ссылки, а не казни.

Меншикова, Петр II сослал поскольку ему было необходимо просто избавиться от человека, а не убить.

Людовика XVI убили, Федора Годунова убили, Шуйского убили, Павла I-го убили, Николая II-го убили. Из сосланных князей лишь Иван VI и Петр III. Во многом это было сделано лишь для того, чтобы просто избавиться от человека не прибегая к насильственной смерти от казни. К тому же, история знает больше случаев убитых царей, нежели казненных.

Answer 2

Why "Great" People Are Not Killed During Changes in Power, Coups, etc., and Instead Are Exiled

In many historical instances, "great" or influential people have been spared from execution during changes in power, coups, and similar events, and have been exiled instead. This practice can be attributed to several reasons:

1. Symbolic Value: - "Great" individuals often hold significant symbolic value, and their execution could lead to public outrage, unrest, or even retaliation from their supporters.

2. International Relations: - Executing prominent figures can have diplomatic repercussions and strain international relations. Exiling them may be seen as a more politically prudent option to avoid such consequences.

3. Potential for Future Use: - Those in power may see value in keeping influential figures alive for potential future use, such as negotiations, leverage, or as a means to maintain stability.

4. Avoiding Martyrdom: - Executing "great" individuals can sometimes lead to their martyrdom, which could further galvanize their supporters and cause more significant challenges to the new regime. Exile may prevent this outcome.

5. Historical Precedent: - Throughout history, exiling influential figures has been a common practice, often serving as a compromise between eliminating a potential threat and avoiding the consequences of their execution.

In summary, sparing "great" individuals during times of political upheaval and opting for exile instead of execution can be attributed to a combination of political, diplomatic, and historical considerations.