Question

Почему только 10% населения получило выгоду от реформ Александра 2​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Потому что не было выгоды у крестьян и у обычных людей

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Why Only 10% of the Population Benefited from Alexander II's Reforms

During the reign of Alexander II, only a small portion of the population, approximately 10%, is believed to have directly benefited from his reforms. This can be attributed to several factors.

Emancipation of the Serfs: The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861 was a significant reform undertaken by Alexander II. However, the manner in which it was implemented limited its impact on the majority of the serfs. The land redistribution that accompanied the emancipation often left the peasants with small, fragmented plots, making it difficult for them to improve their economic situation.

Limited Reforms: While Alexander II introduced various reforms, such as the establishment of local self-government (zemstvos) and judicial reforms, these changes primarily benefited the educated and wealthier classes, leaving the majority of the population, particularly the peasants, with limited direct benefits.

Resistance from the Nobility: The resistance from the nobility, who were reluctant to relinquish their control over the serfs and their land, hindered the full implementation of the reforms. This resistance limited the extent to which the reforms could positively impact the lives of the serfs and the broader population.

Economic Challenges: The economic challenges faced by the newly emancipated serfs, such as high redemption payments for the land they received and the lack of access to credit, hindered their ability to fully benefit from the reforms. This economic burden limited the practical impact of the reforms on a significant portion of the population.

Conclusion: In summary, while Alexander II's reforms marked a significant step towards modernization and social change in Russia, various factors, including the limited scope of the reforms, resistance from the nobility, and economic challenges, contributed to only a small percentage of the population directly benefiting from these initiatives.

It's important to note that the impact of historical events and reforms can be complex and multifaceted, and the assessment of their effects may vary among historians and scholars.