Question

Был ли полезен для большевиков раскол деревни?​

Answer 1

Ответ:да

Объяснение:

Им нужно было ПРИНУДИТЕЛЬНО создать колхозы! А что там с психологией им было фиолетово! На первом месте стоял финансово-материальный интерес. Они хотели отобрать средства производства у тех, кто более-менее обеспен и отдать в общее пользование. Аналогично поступали с имуществом хозяев поместий и вотчин, а не только с более-менее богатыми жителями села.

Answer 2

The Impact of the Peasant Split on the Bolsheviks

The split within the Russian peasantry had both positive and negative effects on the Bolsheviks during the early years of their rule. The Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, came to power in 1917 with the promise of land redistribution and the end of landlordism. However, the implementation of these policies faced significant challenges due to the division within the peasant class.

Positive Effects:

1. Support from the Poor Peasantry: The Bolsheviks gained support from the poor and landless peasants who were eager to see the redistribution of land. These peasants saw the Bolsheviks as champions of their cause and were willing to support their policies.

2. Strengthening the Bolsheviks' Position: The split within the peasantry allowed the Bolsheviks to consolidate their power and strengthen their position. By aligning themselves with the poor peasants, the Bolsheviks were able to build a base of support that helped them maintain control over the countryside.

Negative Effects:

1. Resistance from the Wealthier Peasantry: The wealthier peasants, known as the kulaks, opposed the Bolshevik land redistribution policies. They resisted the collectivization of agriculture and the seizure of their land, leading to conflicts and resistance against the Bolshevik government.

2. Economic Challenges: The split within the peasantry created economic challenges for the Bolsheviks. The disruption caused by the division and resistance from the wealthier peasants hindered agricultural production and led to food shortages and economic instability.

3. Political Instability: The split within the peasantry also contributed to political instability in the early years of Bolshevik rule. The resistance from the wealthier peasants, along with other opposition groups, led to armed uprisings and rebellions against the Bolshevik government.

Overall, while the split within the peasantry presented challenges for the Bolsheviks, it also provided them with a base of support among the poor peasants. The Bolsheviks were able to navigate these challenges and consolidate their power, but the resistance from the wealthier peasants and the economic consequences of the split had long-lasting effects on the Soviet economy and society.