Question

10. Установіть хронологічну послідовність подій національно-визвольної війни. а) Битва під Берестечком б) Битва під Батогом в) Облога Замостя г) Битва під збором. 11.Складіть історичний портрет: а) Б. Хмельницького, б) I. Богуна (за вибором). 12. Чому гетьманський уряд, шукаючи зовнішньополітичної підтримки в боротьбі з Польщею, віддавав перевагу союзу з Московією? СРОЧНО НАДА ДОЮ 30 БАЛОВ ​

Answer 1

Ответ:

10)

1-в

2-Г

3-А

4-Б

Объяснение:

12) У Московської держави був підписаний договір з Річчю Посполитою про тимчасове перемир'я тому Богдан Хмельницький не просив про допомогу раніше, коли договір закінчився Богдан Хмельницький звернувся до Олексія Михайловича через єдність в релігії

Answer 2

Chronological sequence of events in the National Liberation War:

The correct chronological sequence of events in the National Liberation War is as follows:

a) Battle of Berestechko b) Battle of Batoh c) Siege of Zamość d) Battle of Zborów

Historical portrait:

a) Bohdan Khmelnytsky: Bohdan Khmelnytsky was a prominent figure in Ukrainian history and played a crucial role in the National Liberation War. He was born in 1595 in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and belonged to the Cossack nobility. Khmelnytsky became the leader of the Cossack Hetmanate and led the uprising against Polish rule in the mid-17th century. He is known for his military skills, political acumen, and his efforts to establish an independent Ukrainian state. Khmelnytsky's leadership and the Treaty of Pereyaslav in 1654 marked a turning point in Ukrainian history.

b) Ivan Bohun: Ivan Bohun was a Ukrainian military leader and one of the key figures in the National Liberation War. He was born in the mid-17th century and served as a colonel in the Cossack Hetmanate. Bohun is known for his bravery and military prowess, particularly in the Battle of Konotop in 1659. He fought alongside Bohdan Khmelnytsky and played a significant role in the Cossack struggle for independence.

Preference for alliance with Moscow:

The Hetmanate government, led by Bohdan Khmelnytsky, sought external support in its struggle against Poland. One of the reasons for the preference for an alliance with Moscow was the geopolitical situation at the time. The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a powerful neighbor that posed a significant threat to the Hetmanate's independence. On the other hand, Moscow was also a major power in the region and had a common enemy in Poland. By forming an alliance with Moscow, the Hetmanate hoped to gain military and political support to counter Polish aggression.

Additionally, the Hetmanate saw Moscow as a potential ally in its efforts to establish an independent Ukrainian state. Moscow's support could provide the Hetmanate with the necessary resources and diplomatic leverage to negotiate with Poland. The alliance with Moscow was seen as a strategic move to strengthen the Hetmanate's position and increase its chances of success in the struggle against Poland.

It is important to note that the decision to ally with Moscow was not without controversy and had long-term implications for Ukrainian history. The alliance eventually led to the incorporation of Ukrainian territories into the Russian Empire and the subjugation of Ukraine under Russian rule.