Question

1. Первый металлургический завод донбасса а) Юзовский б) Луганский в) Бахмутский г) Торский 2. Строительством металлургического завода на р. Лугань руководил … а) Густав Рейзер б) Готлиб Юнкер в) Карл Гаскойн г) Иоганн Герберштейн 3.Земли Святогорского монастыря, согласно распоряжения Екатерины II, были переданы: а) князю Потемкину б) графу Разумовскому в) графу Румянцеву г) графу Орлов 4.Последним по времени типом землепользования была: а) ранговые дачи б) слободы в) помещичья колонизация с привлечением крепостных крестьян г) казачьи станицы и юрты

Answer 1

Ответ:

1.б) 2.б) 3.а) 4.в)

Объяснение:

просто я умный

Answer 2

First Metallurgical Plant in the Donbass Region

The first metallurgical plant in the Donbass region was the Lugansk Metallurgical Plant. It was established in 1895 and became the first large-scale metallurgical enterprise in the Donbass region. The plant played a significant role in the industrial development of the region and the country as a whole [[1]].

Construction of Metallurgical Plant on the River Luhansk

The construction of the metallurgical plant on the River Luhansk was overseen by Gustav Raizer. Gustav Raizer was a prominent industrialist and entrepreneur who played a key role in the development of the metallurgical industry in the Donbass region. His leadership was instrumental in the establishment and growth of the metallurgical plant on the River Luhansk [[2]].

Transfer of Lands of the Sviatohirsk Monastery

According to the decree of Catherine II, the lands of the Sviatohirsk Monastery were transferred to Count Rumyantsev. Count Rumyantsev was a prominent Russian statesman and military leader who played a significant role in the governance and administration of various regions in the Russian Empire. The transfer of lands to Count Rumyantsev was part of the broader administrative and territorial policies of the Russian Empire during that period [[3]].

Last Type of Land Use

The last type of land use in the region was Cossack settlements and yurts. Cossack settlements and yurts represented a distinct form of land use and settlement in the historical and geographical context of the region. These settlements were integral to the social and cultural fabric of the area during the specified period [[4]].