Question

Помогите ПжлстаThe famous childrem's book writer phillip Pullman thinks that all teachers must be over thirty-five. He says that people must travel a lot before they become teachers,What do you think? In groups work out at leas four arguments for and four arguments against this statement.Помогите пжлста написать эссе или подскажите где его можно найти?

Answer 1

Набери в поиске "Топики по английскому языку" 

Answer 2

Title: The Age of Teachers: Exploring Perspectives

Introduction: The age requirement for teachers has been a topic of debate for many years. Renowned children's book writer, Philip Pullman, suggests that all teachers should be over the age of thirty-five and should have traveled extensively before entering the teaching profession. In this essay, we will examine both the arguments for and against this statement, aiming to gain a deeper understanding of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such a requirement.

Arguments For:

1. Life Experience: One argument in favor of Pullman's statement is that teachers who have traveled and gained life experience are better equipped to engage with their students. By having exposure to different cultures, languages, and perspectives, they can bring a broader range of knowledge and understanding to the classroom. This can enhance the learning experience for students, fostering a more inclusive and diverse educational environment.

2. Cultural Sensitivity: Teachers who have traveled extensively are more likely to be culturally sensitive and aware. They can bring firsthand knowledge of different customs, traditions, and belief systems, which allows them to create a more inclusive and respectful classroom environment. This fosters understanding and empathy among students, promoting tolerance and acceptance.

3. Global Perspective: Traveling provides individuals with a global perspective, enabling them to see beyond their own cultural boundaries. Teachers who have traveled are more likely to incorporate international perspectives into their teaching, exposing students to a broader understanding of the world and encouraging them to become global citizens. This can contribute to the development of critical thinking and open-mindedness.

4. Adaptability and Resilience: Traveling often involves stepping out of one's comfort zone, which builds adaptability and resilience. Teachers who have experienced different environments and faced challenges abroad are more likely to be resilient and flexible in their teaching methods. They can adapt their approaches to meet the diverse needs of their students, ensuring a more effective and personalized learning experience.

Arguments Against:

1. Discrimination and Ageism: Requiring teachers to be over the age of thirty-five may lead to discrimination and ageism in the hiring process. Younger individuals who possess the necessary qualifications, passion, and innovative teaching methods may be excluded based solely on their age. This policy could limit the pool of talented and enthusiastic educators, potentially hindering educational progress.

2. Professional Development: Younger teachers often bring fresh perspectives and innovative teaching techniques, as they may have recently completed their formal education. By excluding younger teachers, the education system may miss out on the opportunity for new ideas and approaches to enhance student learning. It is important to encourage a diverse range of educators at different stages of their careers.

3. Technological Literacy: Younger teachers are more likely to be technologically literate, having grown up in a digital age. They can effectively incorporate technology into their teaching methods, engaging students and preparing them for the digital world. Excluding younger teachers may result in missed opportunities for students to learn and adapt to technological advancements.

4. Passion and Enthusiasm: Age does not necessarily determine a teacher's passion, dedication, or ability to connect with students. Younger teachers may bring a vibrant energy and enthusiasm to the classroom, inspiring students and creating a positive learning environment. By focusing solely on age and travel experience, the education system may overlook exceptional young educators who can make a significant impact on their students' lives.

Conclusion: The debate surrounding the age requirement for teachers and the necessity of travel experiences is complex and multifaceted. While there are valid arguments for both sides, it is crucial to strike a balance that promotes diversity, inclusivity, and innovation within the teaching profession. By embracing teachers of various ages and backgrounds, we can create a dynamic educational system that fosters personal growth, cultural understanding, and academic excellence.