Question

СРОЧНО Помогите написать эссе. Даю много балов.People who want to adopt a pet from an animal shelter often have to prove they have the space and time to look after a new pet. Write an essay in which you present arguments for and against this rule. ​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Объяснение:

There is an interesting rule in animal shelters which states that you need to have enough space and time to look after a new pet. I would like to give arguments for and against this rule.

For some extant I agree with it, as when you take a pet from a shelter, you are fully responsible for its life and its future. You need a lot of free time to feed the animal, to take it for a walk, to tame it and to play with it.

One needs to have enough space, in order to create necessary conditions for its living.

You should buy a big cage for a bird or a hamster, a spacious aquarium for a fish, a large basket for a cat or a small dog.

Your new pet must feel happy and have everything for healthy life.

On the other hand, even if you don't have too much space or time for your new animal, it will feel much better at your house or your flat, than in an animal shelter.

In the shelter, animals live in small cages and nobody pays enough attention to them. Their lives are quite miserable and lonely there.

I always feel sorry for such animals. They suffer in the shelters a lot.

That's why, in my opinion, it's better to give a pet to somebody who will love it and become its true friend, than to leave it in the shelter.

Answer 2

Various studies have shown that a having pet can elongate your life, whilst improving your overall happiness and health. It also helps people with depression, stress, anxiety and many other ailments. The affectionate and loyal nature of dogs as pack animals that form close relationships with their owners can help sufferers of depression, who may feel like they don’t have anybody else.

Stroking your pet can reduce your blood pressure and stress levels, and playing with them can increase the levels of serotonin and dopamine your body produces, making you feel calm and relaxed. Walking the pet is a way to exercise and provides sufferers of anxiety and depression with a reason to leave the house. It also creates opportunities for socialising with other dog walkers. The animal you have helped through rehoming can help you.

Answer 3

Title: The Requirement of Space and Time for Adopting Pets: A Controversial Measure

Introduction: Adopting a pet from an animal shelter is a noble act that brings joy and companionship to both humans and animals. However, many shelters require potential adopters to demonstrate that they have the necessary space and time to care for a new pet. In this essay, we will explore the arguments for and against this rule, considering its impact on both the welfare of the animals and the potential adopters.

Arguments in Favor of the Rule:

1. Ensuring the well-being of the pet: Animal shelters have a responsibility to ensure the welfare of the animals they care for. By requiring adopters to have sufficient space, shelters can help ensure that pets have enough room to exercise, play, and live comfortably. This rule acts as a safeguard against overcrowding and neglect, reducing the chances of the pet experiencing stress or behavioral issues.

2. Time commitment: Pets require time and attention to thrive. By requesting potential adopters to demonstrate their availability, shelters can ensure that pets will receive the necessary care, including exercise, grooming, training, and socialization. This requirement helps reduce the likelihood of pets being left alone for extended periods, which can lead to boredom, anxiety, and behavioral problems.

3. Reducing the risk of returns: By assessing the adopter's suitability based on their living conditions and schedule, shelters can minimize the risk of pets being returned due to incompatible living situations. Ensuring a proper match between the adopter's lifestyle and the pet's needs increases the likelihood of a successful, long-term adoption, minimizing stress for both the pet and the adopter.

Arguments Against the Rule:

1. Discrimination against potential adopters: Requiring adopters to prove their living conditions and availability may exclude individuals or families who genuinely care for animals but do not meet the specific criteria. This rule may inadvertently prevent many loving homes from adopting pets, leaving them in shelters for extended periods or even euthanized due to overcrowding.

2. Inaccurate assessment of an adopter's ability to provide care: Assessing an adopter solely based on their living conditions and availability might not accurately reflect their ability to provide adequate care for a pet. Some individuals might live in smaller spaces but are willing to compensate with additional exercise and enrichment activities. Placing too much emphasis on physical space might overlook the adopter's willingness to provide a loving and stimulating environment for the pet.

3. Potential for dishonesty: While the rule aims to ensure the well-being of the pet, some potential adopters may attempt to deceive shelters by presenting false information about their living conditions or availability. This can lead to pets being placed in unsuitable environments, defeating the purpose of the rule.

Conclusion: The requirement of space and time for adopting pets from animal shelters has its merits and drawbacks. It aims to ensure the welfare of the animals while reducing the risk of unsuccessful adoptions. However, it is crucial to consider the potential exclusion of genuinely caring individuals and the limitations of assessing an adopter based solely on their living conditions. Striking a balance between the requirements and the individual circumstances of potential adopters is essential to ensure the well-being of the pets and increase successful adoptions.