Question

Rewrite the following text in a more academic style. Mark out paragraphs. Until only a few hundred years ago doctors didn't operate on people - it was barbers. A very important point to be mentioned here is the fact that no one had taught the latter how to perform an operation and they'd never got any qualifications. They just did what they'd learned when they were learning to be barbers. Doctors had promised not to hurt anyone so they wouldn't cut people and were not even supposed to watch. But the doctors did watch if barbers were following the rules properly and he sat on a big chair, high up, and read out what the barber was supposed to do, He read this in Latin, which, of course, the barber didn't understand. Of course, if you died, it was always the barber's fault and if you got better, the doctor got the praise. In any case, the doctor got the most money.​

Answer 1

Ответ:

ээ

Объяснение:

че ты тут настрочил на своем англиском нифига не понял иди в пень кароче

Answer 2

In the not-so-distant past, a practice that has evolved significantly over the centuries, the role of performing surgical procedures was not entrusted to medical doctors but was rather the domain of barbers. This historical phenomenon merits attention due to the remarkable fact that barbers were not formally trained or accredited to carry out surgical operations. Their surgical expertise, if it could be termed as such, was largely derived from their prior training as barbers.

A critical distinction lies in the absence of formal qualifications and training among barbers for surgical procedures. Unlike modern medical practitioners who undergo extensive education and training, barbers of yore did not have the benefit of structured instruction in the art of surgery. Instead, they relied on the knowledge and techniques passed down through the apprenticeship system for barbers.

Medical doctors of the time, in contrast, had made explicit promises to their patients not to inflict harm during surgical interventions. This ethical commitment included refraining from physically cutting individuals. In fact, doctors were often forbidden from participating directly in surgical procedures. However, they did oversee the work of barbers to ensure adherence to established guidelines.

To fulfill their supervisory role, doctors typically occupied an elevated position, sitting atop a large chair from which they observed and guided the surgical process. Communication between the doctor and the barber was conducted in Latin, a language that the barbers themselves typically did not comprehend. This linguistic barrier further underscored the separation between medical doctors and barbers, emphasizing the distinction in their respective roles.

In this historical context, responsibility for the outcome of surgical procedures rested primarily with the barbers. If a patient's condition deteriorated or resulted in fatality, blame was often attributed to the barber. Conversely, any improvement or recovery following a surgical intervention led to the medical doctor receiving commendation and, notably, monetary compensation.

In conclusion, this historical perspective sheds light on the division of labor and responsibilities in the field of surgery until relatively recent times. The coexistence of barbers and medical doctors in the realm of surgical procedures underscores the evolution of medical practice and underscores the significant advances made in medical education and professionalism over the centuries.