Question

Model: If I saw this film, I would tell you about it. If I had seen this film, I would have told you about it. 1. If you chose this room, you would watch TV. 2. If you investigate this problem, you would answer this question. 3. If he measured the temperature, he would explain this phenomenon. 4. If they unified the fact they would prove the fact. 5. If they processed the data, they would have the results.

Answer 1

If I had seen this film, I would have told you about it.

1. If you had chosen  this room, you would watched TV. 2. If you  have investigated  this problem, you would have answered this question. 3. If he had measured the temperature, he would has explained this phenomenon. 4. If they had unified the fact

they would have  proved the fact. 5. If they had processed the data, they would have had the results.

Answer 2

It looks like you've provided a series of sentences that follow a similar grammatical structure involving conditional statements. In each case, there is a conditional "if" clause followed by a result clause. The "if" clause expresses a hypothetical condition, and the result clause describes the potential outcome of that condition being met. These sentences are constructed using the second conditional (for present/future unreal situations) and the third conditional (for past unreal situations). Let's break down each sentence:

1. If you chose this room, you would watch TV. (Second Conditional)

   • This sentence talks about a hypothetical situation in the present or future: choosing a room. The result of that hypothetical situation is watching TV.

2. If you investigate this problem, you would answer this question. (Second Conditional)

   • Similar to the first sentence, this talks about a hypothetical situation: investigating a problem. The result of this hypothetical situation is answering a question.

3. If he measured the temperature, he would explain this phenomenon. (Second Conditional)

   • Again, a hypothetical situation is presented: measuring the temperature. The result would be explaining a phenomenon.

4. If they unified the fact, they would prove the fact. (Second Conditional)

   • This sentence follows the same pattern, where unifying the fact is the hypothetical condition, and proving the fact is the potential result.

5. If they processed the data, they would have the results. (Second Conditional)

   • Once more, a hypothetical condition (processing the data) is given, and the potential result is having the results.

In all these sentences, the second conditional is used to describe unreal or hypothetical situations in the present or future, with a corresponding result. This form of conditional is used to express things that are unlikely, contrary to fact, or speculative.

If you want to convert these sentences into the third conditional (for past unreal situations), you would use a structure like "If + subject + had + past participle, subject + would + have + past participle." This form is used to discuss hypothetical situations in the past that did not happen.