Question

ПЕРЕВЕДИТЕ КТО СМОЖЕТ,СРОЧНО НУЖНО СДАВАТЬ A recent survey found that 90% of youngaged eight to fifteen own their own video gaconsole. But should video games be banned to aharmful influences on children? Firstly, video games have a direct effect on healthPlaying them means that children get less outdoorexercise. As a result, they can become overweight oreven obese. On the other hand, the mental healthbenefits are undeniable. For example, playing videogames helps youngsters relax and let off steam, which inturn reduces stress. Secondly, video games are linked to educationissues. Critics say they should be banned because theycause children to neglect their schoolwork.Consequently, their grades and classroom performancesuffer. However, it has been shown children can actuallylearn from playing video games. They develop differentabilities such as coordination skills and logical thinking. Finally, many computer games have some violencein them. People in favour of banning them say that theyaffect youths' behaviour in the outside world. They copythe violence they see on the screen and become moreaggressive. In contrast, there are others who claim thatteens are intelligent enough to tell the differencebetween games and the real world. They know that theviolence they see on their video screen is fake. All in all, there are arguments both for and againstbanning video games. I strongly believe parents shoulddecide which games their children play and for howlong. Therefore, there is no need to ban them.​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Недавний опрос показал, что 90% молодых

в возрасте от восьми до пятнадцати лет имеют свои собственные видео

приставка. Но если видеоигры будут запрещены

вредное влияние на детей?

Во-первых, видеоигры напрямую влияют на здоровье

Играя с ними, дети становятся меньше на улице

упражнение. В результате они могут стать лишними или

даже тучный С другой стороны, психическое здоровье

преимущества неоспоримы. Например, проигрывание видео

игры помогают молодежи расслабиться и выпустить пар, который в

поворот уменьшает стресс.

Во-вторых, видеоигры связаны с образованием

проблемы. Критики говорят, что они должны быть забанены, потому что они

заставить детей пренебрегать своей школьной работой.

Следовательно, их оценки и классная работа

страдать. Тем не менее, было показано, что дети могут на самом деле

учиться играть в видеоигры. Они развиваются разные

такие способности, как координационные навыки и логическое мышление.

Наконец, во многих компьютерных играх есть насилие

в них. Люди в пользу их запрета говорят, что они

влияет на поведение молодежи во внешнем мире. Они копируют

насилие они видят на экране и становятся более

агрессивны. Напротив, есть другие, которые утверждают, что

подростки достаточно умны, чтобы заметить разницу

между играми и реальным миром. Они знают, что

насилие, которое они видят на своем видеоэкране, является фальшивкой.

В общем, есть аргументы как за, так и против

Запрет видеоигр. Я твердо верю, что родители должны

решить, в какие игры играют их дети и как

долго. Поэтому нет необходимости их запрещать.

Answer 2

A recent survey found that 90% of young people aged eight to fifteen own their own video game console. But should video games be banned due to harmful influences on children? Firstly, video games have a direct effect on health, as playing them often means that children get less outdoor exercise, leading to potential issues with weight, including overweight or obesity. However, video games also provide mental health benefits, as they help youngsters relax and let off steam, ultimately reducing stress.

Secondly, video games have been associated with education issues. Critics argue that they should be banned because they can cause children to neglect their schoolwork, resulting in poorer grades and classroom performance. However, research has shown that children can actually learn from playing video games. They can develop different abilities such as coordination skills and logical thinking.

Finally, many computer games contain violence, leading some people to advocate for their banning, claiming they influence youths' behavior in the outside world. These critics argue that children may imitate the violence they see on the screen and become more aggressive. On the other hand, some argue that teenagers are intelligent enough to distinguish between games and reality, understanding that the violence they see on their screens is fictional.

In conclusion, there are arguments both for and against banning video games. However, the writer strongly believes that parents should be responsible for deciding which games their children play and for how long. Therefore, an outright ban may not be necessary if parents take an active role in monitoring their children's gaming habits.