Question

Some people argue that in the modern world it is necessary to be able to speak at least two foreign languages. Others say that it is better to know one foreign language very well than to have poor command of two foreign languages. What is your opinion? Use the following plan: - make an introduction (state the problem) - express your opinion and give reasons for it - give arguments for the other point of view - explain why you don`t agree with it - draw a conclusion

Answer 1

Ответ:What is our problem?We need to think that it is better to learn one foreign language and know it well or two foreign languages and know them poorly.Let's think.If we learn one language, but know it well,then when we need to ask something in that language or answer, we can ask or answer without mistakes.Well, for example, if we go to rest in England and know English, we will not make a mistake in pronunciation, in response to a question and so on.Let's take another point of view about two languages,but we do not know them well.We can make mistakes in pronunciation and in response.And we could be embarrassed.We won't understand this man well.For example, we came to England.We know two languages: French and English.We met a man from England who speaks English.We understand it's English, but we can't understand what he wants.Although we are learning English, we partially understand this person and can tell this person that for nothing.Which is better?It is good to know one or two languages, but it is bad.Better already know one language, than two languages and say all sorts of nonsense.So one language is better.

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Introduction: The question of whether it is more beneficial to speak two foreign languages at a basic level or to have a high proficiency in one foreign language is a matter of debate in today's modern world. In this response, I will express my opinion on this matter, presenting reasons for favoring proficiency in one language over basic knowledge of two. While there are valid arguments for the opposing viewpoint, I will explain why I disagree with it and ultimately draw a conclusion based on the given arguments.

Opinion and Reasons: In my opinion, it is better to have a strong command of one foreign language rather than a poor grasp of two. Proficiency in a foreign language offers numerous advantages, both personally and professionally. By dedicating time and effort to mastering one language, individuals can attain a higher level of fluency, enabling them to communicate effectively in various situations and engage in deeper cultural exchanges.

Firstly, learning a language requires considerable time and effort. By focusing on one language, individuals can allocate their resources more efficiently and effectively. Mastering a language demands practice, exposure to authentic materials, and cultural immersion, which become increasingly challenging when trying to divide one's attention between two languages. By concentrating efforts on a single language, learners can dedicate more time to refining their listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills, leading to a higher level of proficiency overall.

Secondly, a high level of proficiency in one language opens doors to a broader range of opportunities. In today's interconnected world, knowing a foreign language well can enhance career prospects, facilitate international travel, and promote cross-cultural understanding. Employers often seek individuals with advanced language skills, as they can effectively communicate with clients and partners from different cultures. Moreover, deepening one's understanding of a foreign language enables individuals to appreciate literature, music, films, and other cultural artifacts in their original form, offering a more authentic and enriching experience.

Arguments for the Other Point of View: Those who argue in favor of knowing at least two foreign languages often emphasize the importance of versatility and the ability to communicate with a wider range of people. In an increasingly globalized world, where cross-cultural interactions are becoming more frequent, the ability to communicate with individuals from different linguistic backgrounds can be advantageous. Additionally, knowing multiple languages may provide more opportunities for travel, employment, and cultural exchange.

Why I Disagree: While the points raised in favor of knowing two foreign languages are valid, I believe that the benefits of attaining a high level of proficiency in one language outweigh the advantages of basic knowledge in two languages. Language learning requires substantial dedication, and dividing one's attention between two languages can hinder the depth of understanding and mastery of either language. By prioritizing one language, individuals can develop the necessary linguistic and cultural competence to truly engage with others in meaningful ways.

Conclusion: In conclusion, while the ability to speak multiple foreign languages is undoubtedly valuable, I maintain that it is more beneficial to have a strong command of one foreign language than to possess a superficial grasp of two. By investing time and effort into mastering a single language, individuals can achieve a higher level of proficiency, unlocking a host of personal and professional opportunities. Language learning is a rewarding endeavor, and by focusing on one language, individuals can fully immerse themselves in the culture and gain a deep understanding of the language's intricacies.