Question

Did you visit the HISTORIC/historical sites of ancient Rome? почему пишем HISTORIC а не HISTORICAL?

Answer 1

тут речь идёт об исторических местах Рима, historic применяется к знаменитым или важным в истории вещам, а historical просто о событиях прошлого

Answer 2

The choice between "historic" and "historical" depends on the context and the intended meaning.

"Historic" is typically used to describe something that is significant, important, or famous in history. For example, if you're talking about a building or event that played a crucial role in the past, you might use "historic."

"Historical," on the other hand, refers to something related to or connected with history in a general sense. It is used when you want to emphasize the historical context or the fact that something belongs to a particular period in history.

So, whether you should say "historic" or "historical" when referring to ancient Roman sites would depend on your intended meaning:

• If you want to emphasize the significance and importance of the sites in ancient Roman history, you might say, "Did you visit the HISTORIC sites of ancient Rome?"

• If you want to emphasize that the sites are related to ancient Roman history in a general sense, you might say, "Did you visit the HISTORICAL sites of ancient Rome?"

Both "historic" and "historical" can be used in the context of ancient Roman sites, but the choice depends on what aspect of those sites you want to emphasize.