Вопрос задан 30.04.2019 в 04:24. Предмет Обществознание. Спрашивает Мусаева Алсу.

В чем смысл филосовского вопроса о познаваемости мира??

0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Аниськина Алина.
Зачем познавать мир?
Я думаю потому, что в мире очень много чего осталось неизвесного нам. Например Мировой океан известен нам только на 3°/°… Это значит, что нас ещё столько всего ждёт. Мы точно незнаем, какие животные обитают в Марианской впадине. Можно ли едовитые рачтения использовать как лекарство от самых тяжёлых болезней (+от многих болезней мы незнаем как излечится)
Вот как-то так.
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

The Meaning of the Philosophical Question on the Knowability of the World

The question of the knowability of the world is a fundamental philosophical inquiry that explores the limits of human understanding and the extent to which we can acquire knowledge about the world around us. It delves into the nature of knowledge, the methods of acquiring knowledge, and the boundaries of human cognition.

The question can be approached from different perspectives and has been a subject of debate among philosophers throughout history. Some philosophers argue that the world is ultimately knowable, and that through reason, observation, and empirical evidence, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of reality. Others contend that there are inherent limitations to human knowledge, and that certain aspects of the world may be beyond our grasp.

One key aspect of the question is the distinction between empirical knowledge and metaphysical knowledge. Empirical knowledge is based on direct sensory experience and observation, while metaphysical knowledge deals with abstract concepts and principles that may not be directly observable. The debate often centers around whether metaphysical knowledge is attainable or if it is limited to empirical knowledge alone.

Another important consideration is the role of language and conceptual frameworks in shaping our understanding of the world. Some philosophers argue that our knowledge is inherently shaped by the limitations of language and the concepts we use to interpret and make sense of our experiences. This raises questions about whether our understanding of the world is limited by the constraints of our linguistic and conceptual frameworks.

The question of the knowability of the world also intersects with other philosophical inquiries, such as the nature of reality, the existence of objective truths, and the relationship between the knower and the known. It touches on epistemology, the branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of knowledge and belief.

Ultimately, the question of the knowability of the world is a complex and multifaceted inquiry. It invites us to critically examine the limits of human understanding, the methods of acquiring knowledge, and the nature of reality itself. While philosophers have offered various perspectives on this question, it remains a subject of ongoing debate and exploration in the field of philosophy.

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Обществознание

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Обществознание

Задать вопрос