Question

Эссе по фразе С врагом можно бороться двумя способами:во первых,законами, во вторых , силой.Первый способ присущ человеку, второй зверю

Answer 1

Законы диктуют возможность последующих действий и являются важнейшим способом ограничения возможностей. Царь диктующий нужные указы для укрепления своих войск ,будет куда умнее царя бездумно ведущего на смерть свое войско

Answer 2

Introduction

The phrase "С врагом можно бороться двумя способами: во первых, законами, во вторых, силой" translates to "There are two ways to fight an enemy: firstly, with laws, and secondly, with force." This statement suggests that there are two approaches to dealing with an enemy, one civilized and legal, and the other more aggressive and forceful. In this essay, we will explore these two methods of combating an enemy and discuss their implications.

Fighting with Laws

The first approach mentioned in the phrase is fighting with laws. This method implies using legal systems, regulations, and established procedures to address conflicts and confrontations. By relying on laws, societies aim to maintain order, justice, and fairness in dealing with enemies or adversaries. This approach is often associated with civilized behavior and the rule of law.

Fighting with laws allows for a structured and regulated process of resolving disputes. It provides a framework for negotiations, arbitration, and legal proceedings. By adhering to laws, individuals and nations can seek peaceful resolutions and avoid resorting to violence or force. This approach emphasizes the importance of diplomacy, negotiation, and compromise in resolving conflicts.

Citation: - Source "..." - Source " "

Fighting with Force

The second approach mentioned in the phrase is fighting with force. This method suggests using physical power, aggression, and military capabilities to combat enemies. Unlike the legal approach, this method relies on the use of force to overpower or defeat adversaries. It is often associated with a more primal and instinctive response to threats.

Fighting with force involves military actions, such as warfare, battles, and armed conflicts. It may involve the use of weapons, troops, and strategic maneuvers to gain an advantage over the enemy. This approach prioritizes strength, dominance, and the ability to overpower opponents.

While fighting with force can be effective in certain situations, it often comes with significant human and societal costs. Armed conflicts can result in loss of life, destruction of infrastructure, and long-lasting consequences for both sides involved. Therefore, this approach is generally considered a last resort when all other peaceful means have been exhausted.

Citation: - Source "..."

The Dichotomy between Humans and Animals

The phrase also suggests a dichotomy between humans and animals in their approach to fighting enemies. It states that the first method, fighting with laws, is inherent to humans, while the second method, fighting with force, is characteristic of animals.

This distinction implies that humans possess a higher level of consciousness, rationality, and moral judgment compared to animals. Humans have the ability to create and abide by laws, establish social norms, and seek peaceful resolutions to conflicts. Animals, on the other hand, rely on instinct and physical strength to protect themselves and secure their survival.

While this distinction may oversimplify the complexities of human behavior and animal behavior, it highlights the unique qualities that humans possess, such as the capacity for empathy, reasoning, and the ability to create and enforce laws.

Citation: - Source "..."

Conclusion

In conclusion, the phrase "С врагом можно бороться двумя способами: во первых, законами, во вторых, силой" suggests that there are two ways to fight an enemy: with laws and with force. The first approach involves using legal systems, regulations, and established procedures to address conflicts, while the second approach relies on physical power and aggression.

Fighting with laws emphasizes diplomacy, negotiation, and compromise, while fighting with force prioritizes strength and dominance. The phrase also implies a distinction between humans and animals, suggesting that humans have the ability to create and abide by laws, while animals rely on instinct and physical strength.

It is important to note that the effectiveness and appropriateness of each approach may vary depending on the specific circumstances and the nature of the conflict. Ultimately, the choice between these two methods depends on the values, ethics, and goals of individuals and societies.