Question

Задача по гражданскому праву Гражданка Т обратилась в суд о разделе совместно нажитого имущества. Просит сыскать с ответчика гражданина Т.И. денежную сумму в размере 1,5 млн. рублей за автомобиль. В обосновании иска указав, что 12.2007 был брак с ответчиком, в 03.2015 года брак был расторгнут по решению мирового судьи. Соглашения о разделе имущества нет. В период брака 01.2012 был приобретен в кредит автомобиль на 5 лет на ответчика Т.И. С 09.2015 года автомобиль пропал, ответчик не поясняет, где автомобиль. Гражданка Т. Просит взыскать стоимость половины авто.

Answer 1

Ответ: Если нет соглашения о разделе имущества,то по идее автомобиль считается совместно нажитым имуществом,несмотря на то что за кредит выплачивал бывший муж.

Объяснение: Гражданка Т, вправе потребовать свою долю, естественно только через суд.

Answer 2

Background Information

In this case, Citizen T has filed a lawsuit in court for the division of jointly acquired property. She is requesting a monetary sum of 1.5 million rubles from the defendant, Citizen T.I., for a car. The basis for the claim is that they were married in December 2007 and divorced in March 2015 by a decision of a magistrate. There is no agreement regarding the division of property. During the marriage, in January 2012, a car was purchased on credit for 5 years, with Citizen T.I. as the debtor. Since September 2015, the car has been missing, and the defendant does not provide any information about its whereabouts. Citizen T. is requesting the court to award her the value of half of the car.

Relevant Laws and Principles

In order to address this case, we need to consider relevant laws and principles of civil law in Russia. Some key points to consider are:

1. Marital Property: In Russia, property acquired during the marriage is generally considered to be jointly owned by both spouses, unless otherwise specified by law or agreement between the spouses [[1]].

2. Division of Property: In the absence of an agreement between the spouses regarding the division of property, the court will determine the division based on the principles of fairness and taking into account the interests of both parties [[2]].

3. Loss of Property: If jointly owned property is lost or damaged due to the fault of one of the spouses, that spouse may be held responsible for compensating the other spouse for their share of the lost or damaged property [[3]].

Analysis and Conclusion

Based on the information provided, Citizen T has a valid claim for the division of jointly acquired property. The car in question was purchased during the marriage and is therefore considered to be jointly owned by both spouses. Since the defendant, Citizen T.I., has not provided any information about the whereabouts of the car, it can be argued that the car is lost and the defendant may be held responsible for compensating Citizen T for her share of the lost car.

However, it is important to note that the final decision will be made by the court, taking into account all the relevant circumstances and evidence presented by both parties. The court will consider the value of the car, the financial situation of both parties, and any other relevant factors in order to determine a fair division of the jointly acquired property.

Please note that this response is based on the information provided and general principles of civil law in Russia. For a more accurate assessment of the case, it is recommended to consult with a legal professional.